DIGITAL COMPETENCE AND DATA LITERACY IN FRAUD DETECTION

Authors

  • Erfan Erfiansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
  • Agus Bagianto Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
  • Hamiz Al-Qowiyy Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
  • Laila Husna Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v18i1.39098

Keywords:

digital competence, data science literacy, diagnostic skills, fraud detection skills, generation z

Abstract

Despite increasing digitalization in the accounting profession, limited empirical evidence explains how digital competence is transformed into effective fraud detection capability, particularly among early-career accountants. This study aims at examining the effects of digital competence and data science literacy on fraud detection skills, with diagnostic skills as a mediating mechanism among Generation Z accountants in Indonesia. Using a quantitative survey of 150 respondents and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the findings show that digital competence does not directly enhance fraud detection skills but operates through data science literacy and diagnostic skills. Diagnostic skills emerge as the key cognitive mechanism converting technological capability into fraud detection effectiveness. These results imply that accounting education and professional training should prioritize diagnostic reasoning alongside digital and analytical skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950

Al Natour AR, Al-Mawali H, Zaidan H, Said YHZ (2023), "The role of forensic accounting skills in fraud detection and the moderating effect of CAATTs application: evidence from Egypt". Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 23 No. 1 pp. 30–55, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0279

Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684

Bakumenko, A., & Elragal, A. (2022). Detecting Anomalies in Financial Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Systems, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050130

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 33-52). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.

Bose, S., Kumar Dey, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2023). "Chapter 3: Big data, data analytics and artificial intelligence in accounting: an overview". In Handbook of Big Data Research Methods. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Jul 28, 2026, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800888555.00007

Brazel, J. F., Jones, K. L., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2009). Using nonfinancial measures to assess fraud risk. Journal of accounting research, 47(5), 1135-1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00349.x

Cao, M., Chychyla, R., & Stewart, T. (2015). Big Data Analytics in Financial Statement Audits. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51068

Dzuranin, A. C., Jones, J. R., & Olvera, R. M. (2018). Infusing data analytics into the accounting curriculum: A framework and insights from faculty. Journal of Accounting Education, 43, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.03.004

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences*. Behavior Research Methods., Vol. 39, N(175–191). https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Handoko*, B. L., Mulyawan, A. N., Tanuwijaya, J., & Tanciady, F. (2020). Big Data in Auditing for the Future of Data Driven Fraud Detection. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(3), 2902–2907. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.b7568.019320

Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022). Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429

Kassem, R., & Omoteso, K. (2023). Effective methods for detecting fraudulent financial reporting: Practical insights from Big 4 auditors. Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-03-2023-0055

Kroon, N., Alves, M. d. C., & Martins, I. (2021). The impacts of emerging technologies on accountants’ role and skills: Connecting to open innovation — A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030163

Li, F., Han, S., Zhang, H., Ding, J., Zhang, J., & Wu, J. (2019). Application of Benford’s law in data analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1168, No. 3, p. 032133). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1168/3/032133.

Li, H., Dai, J., Gershberg, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Understanding usage and value of audit analytics for internal auditors: An organizational approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 28, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.12.005

Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of applied structural equation modeling, 4(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: a journal of practice & theory, 28(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.

Richins, G., Herrmann, A., Berschet, K., & Seligman, J. (2017). Big Data Analytics: Opportunity or Threat for the Accounting Profession? Administrative Sciences, Vol. 11, N, BP1–BP29. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51805

Sutton, S. G., Arnold, V., & Holt, M. (2018). How much automation is too much? Keeping the human relevant in knowledge work. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 15(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-52311

Tiron-Tudor, A., Donțu, A. N., & Bresfelean, V. P. (2022). Emerging Technologies’ Contribution to the Digital Transformation in Accountancy Firms. Electronics, 11(22), 3818. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223818

Tutino, M., & Merlo, M. (2019). Accounting fraud: A literature review. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 9(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv9i1p1

Wona, G. P., & Wany, E. (2024). Future Accountant for Career : Pengaruh Karir Profesi Akuntan Terhadap Minat Mahasiswa Akuntansi Gen Z Di Era Digital. Journal of Accounting and Financial Issue (JAFIS), 5(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.24929/jafis.v5i1.3448

Yeni Priatnasari, Widagdo, A. K., & Gantyowati, E. (2020). A Review on Fraud Research : A Study of Vote Count. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 1(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v1i2.59

Zhao, X., Yang, D., Li, Z., & Song, L. (2021). Multiple large shareholders and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China (p. 15(9)). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-021-00106-9

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20