PROFITABILITY IMPLICATIONS OF ESG CONTROVERSY MANAGEMENT UNDER FINANCIAL OPACITY IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v18i1.41171Keywords:
dynamic capability perspective, esg controversy management, financial distress, financial opacity, financial performance, refinitiv eikonAbstract
ESG controversies threaten firms’ legitimacy and stakeholder trust; however, evidence on their financial impact and the role of financial opacity remains limited. This study aims at examining whether ESG controversy management enhances financial performance in emerging markets and whether this relationship is conditioned by financial opacity. Using panel data of Indonesian listed firms from 2011 to 2023 and Refinitiv’s ESGC score, where higher values indicate stronger capabilities to address sustainability incidents, the study is grounded in legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, and the dynamic capability perspective. The multi-method approach includes firm-, year-, and industry-fixed effects, entropy balancing, propensity score matching, and the Heckman two-stage model, while controlling for firm size, leverage, growth opportunities, and audit quality. The results show that effective ESGC management improves profitability, but the effect weakens in financially opaque firms, with implications for ESG oversight and disclosure.
Downloads
References
Abdou, H.A., Ellelly, N.N., Elamer, A.A., Hussainey, K. and Yazdifar, H. 2021. Corporate governance and earnings management nexus: Evidence from the UK and Egypt using neural networks. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), pp. 6281–6311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2120.
Alsayegh, M.F., Abdul Rahman, R. and Homayoun, S. 2020. Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), p. 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910.
Anggraini, G. and Hermawan, A. 2025. SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS IN INDONESIA’S OIL AND GAS SECTOR. JRAK, 17(2), pp. 332–347. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v17i2.26356.
Barnett, M.L. 2019. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 58(1), pp. 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660044.
Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H. and Welker, M. 2003. The World Price of Earnings Opacity. The Accounting Review, 78(3), pp. 641–678. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641.
Bushman, R., Chen, Q., Engel, E. and Smith, A. 2004. Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), pp. 167–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005.
Cho, S.Y., Lee, C. and Pfeiffer, R.J. 2013. Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), pp. 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005.
D’Amico, E., Coluccia, D., Fontana, S. and Solimene, S. 2016. Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), pp. 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1865.
DeFond, M.L. and Hung, M. 2003. An empirical analysis of analysts’ cash flow forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(1), pp. 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00098-8.
Delgado, F.J., Fernández-Rodríguez, E., García-Fernández, R., Landajo, M. and Martínez-Arias, A. 2023. Tax avoidance and earnings management: a neural network approach for the largest European economies. Financial Innovation, 9(1), p. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00424-8.
Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A. and Yang, Y.G. 2011. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), pp. 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005.
Dhaliwal, D.S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A. and Yang, Y.G. 2012. Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), pp. 723–759. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10218.
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A. and Díez-de-Castro, E. 2021. Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept. The jungle of organizational legitimacy. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), p. 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.001.
Elamer, A.A. and Boulhaga, M. 2024. ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), pp. 3312–3327. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2749.
Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A. and Saleh, A. 2021. ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, p. 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M. and Kaiser, S. 2018. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, pp. 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.
Feng, Z.-Y., Wang, Y.-C. and Wang, W.-G. 2024. Corporate carbon reduction and tax avoidance: International evidence. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20(2), p. 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100416.
Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. 2015. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), pp. 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.
Gangi, F., Daniele, L.M. and Varrone, N. 2020. How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), pp. 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2482.
Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B. and Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), pp. 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.750.
Gupta, K., Crilly, D. and Greckhamer, T. 2020. Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10), pp. 1869–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3204.
Healy, P.M. and Palepu, K.G. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), pp. 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0.
Hutton, A.P., Marcus, A.J. and Tehranian, H. 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk☆. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), pp. 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003.
Jiang, H., Hu, W. and Jiang, P. 2024. Does ESG performance affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 61, p. 105056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105056.
Kim, Y., Park, M.S. and Wier, B. 2012. Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), pp. 761–796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209.
Krüger, P. 2015. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), pp. 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008.
Lenz, T. and Viola, L.A. 2017. Legitimacy and institutional change in international organisations: a cognitive approach. Review of International Studies, 43(5), pp. 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000201.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D. and Wysocki, P.D. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), pp. 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. 2017. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), pp. 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505.
Lucut Capras, I., Achim, M.V. and Mara, E.R. 2024. Is tax avoidance one of the purposes of financial data manipulation? The case of Romania. The Journal of Risk Finance, 25(4), pp. 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-11-2023-0273.
Luo, X. and Bhattacharya, C.B. 2009. The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), pp. 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198.
Mansikkamäki, S. 2023. Firm growth and profitability: The role of age and size in shifts between growth–profitability configurations. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, p. e00372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00372.
Niesten, E., Jolink, A. and Bacha, E. 2024. Sustainable development in turbulent environments: The impact of ESG capabilities on responses to turbulence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), pp. 6468–6490. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3827.
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R.M. and Marshall, R.S. 2015. Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), pp. 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004.
Prastiwi, A., Atmini, S., Pusposari, D., Martika Sari, Y. and Christinawati Putri, F. 2025. THE RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFITABILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE. JRAK, 17(2), pp. 414–427. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v17i2.29561.
Sastroredjo, P.E., Ausloos, M. and Khrennikova, P. 2025. Eco-Innovation and Earnings Management: Unveiling the Moderating Effects of Financial Constraints and Opacity in FTSE All-Share Firms. Sustainability, 17(11), p. 4860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114860.
Shahab, Y., Ye, Z., Liu, J. and Nadeem, M. 2025. Social Trust, Environmental Violations, and Remedial Actions in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(3), pp. 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05818-5.
Souguir, Z., Lassoued, N., Khanchel, I. and Bouzgarrou, H. 2024. Environmental performance and corporate tax avoidance: Greenwashing policy or eco-responsibility? The moderating role of ownership structure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, p. 140152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140152.
Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A. and Waddock, S. 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), pp. 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820.
Thanasas, G.L., Filiou, A. and Smaraidos, V. 2018. The impact of corporate governance on earnings management in emerging economies: the Greek evidence. International Journal of Comparative Management, 1(3), p. 317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCM.2018.10015717.
Valentinov, V. and Chia, R. 2022. Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), pp. 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12441.
Yu, E.P., Guo, C.Q. and Luu, B. Van 2018. Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), pp. 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047.
Zhang, D. and Liu, L. 2022. Does ESG Performance Enhance Financial Flexibility? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(18), p. 11324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811324.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Probowo Erawan Sastroredjo , Tarsisius Renald Suganda, Dorothy Srikandi Halim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
