MAKNA SIMBOLIK DALAM TRADISI MELEPASKAN MASA DUKA CITA DI SUKU BABULU,TIMOR LESTE

Authors

  • Domingos Marcal de Jesus Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/linimasa.v8i2.12474

Keywords:

Keywords: Cultural Identity, Symbolic Interaction, Symbolic Meaning, Kore Metan Tradition.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Kore Metan is a tradition in Timor Leste which is still carried out when a family member dies. This research aims to find out the messages contained in the Kore Metan tradition and analyze its symbolic meaning in the Babulu Tribe. The research applies a qualitative descriptive approach using Symbolic Interaction Theory and Cultural Identity Theory. Symbolic Interaction Theory is used to analyze the Self-Concept, Action Concept, Object Concept, Social Interaction Concept, and Collective Action Concept in interactions in the Kore Metan tradition. Primary data was obtained through in-depth interviews and observations, while secondary data was obtained from literature studies. The research results show that the Kore Metan tradition is carried out when a family member dies, with the aim of expressing condolences for one year, since the family member died, using black cloth or Lutu Metan. This tradition has the following symbolic meanings: 1) harmony, togetherness, community self-awareness to carry out traditions from generation to generation, 2) Responsibility in maintaining traditions, 3) Kore Metan is done by removing a black cloth as a symbol of letting go of the period of mourning for the person who died. died, 4) The Kore Metan tradition further strengthens relations between residents through cooperation in organizing events, and 5) There are procedures for implementing the tradition which consists of the planning process, forming a committee, and financial contributions in carrying out the Kore Metan tradition. The core meaning of this tradition is that the people of the Babulu tribe respect their ancestors and carry out this tradition from generation to generation.    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baene Elifasi, & Harefa Tatema Anugerah. (2023). TRADISI FOTU NINA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN MORAL KELUARGA.

Colo, F. F., & Setiani, P. P. (2021). Makna Kore Metan Masyarakat Imigran Timor-Timor Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKIP Budi Utomo, 2(01), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.33503/prosiding.v2i01.1516

Eviana Tika. (2023). MAKNA SIMBOLIK SENI BEGALAN DALAM TRADISI PERNIKAHAN KABUPATEN BANYUMAS. www.uinsaizu.ac.id

Iskandar, D. (2004). IDENTITAS BUDAYA DALAM KOMUNIKASI ANTAR-BUDAYA: Kasus Etnik Madura dan Etnik Dayak. In Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya (Vol. 6, Issue 2).

KBBI. (2023). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Keesing, R. M. (2014). Teori-Teori Tentang Budaya.

Kusherdyana, R., & Pd, M. (2020). Pengertian Budaya, Lintas Budaya, dan Teori yang Melandasi Lintas Budaya.

Kusumaning Tiyas, M. (2018). The Symbolic Meaning of the Udan Dawet Ritual in the Agricultural Community of Terkesi Selatan Village. Channel : Jurnal Komunikasi, xx–xx. http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/CHANNEL|E:channel@comm.uad.ac.id

Liliweri, A., & Dahlan, A. (2018). Konfigurasi Dasar Teori-Teori Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Penerbit Nusa Media PO BOX.

Lopes, C. A., Aloysius, L., & Meilawati, F. T. (2023). MAKNA RITUS KORE METAN (LEPAS KAIN HITAM) (SEBUAH KAJIAN FENOMENOLOGI PADA KOMUNITAS WARGA BARU DI MOTA’AIN KABUPATEN BELU). In Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi (Vol. 3, Issue 1).

Mahdayeni, Roihan Alhaddad, M., & Syukri Saleh, A. (2019). MANUSIA DAN KEBUDAYAAN.

Mustika, S. (2018). MELESTARIKAN BATIK TRADISIONAL RIFA’IYAH SEBAGAI IDENTITAS BUDAYA KOMUNITAS RIFA’IYAH. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 21(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v21i1.522

Rohma Wulandari, D. (2020). PROSES DAN PERAN KOMUNIKASI DALAM MENGATASI CULTURE SHOCK (STUDI KASUS PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS TADULAKO).

Setiawati, R., Karmin Baruadi, M., & Lantowa, J. (2023). UNSUR DAN FUNGSI BUDAYA MASYARAKAT JAWA DALAM NOVEL PARA PRIYAYI KARYA UMAR KAYAM (TINJAUAN ANTROPOLOGI SASTRA). In Jambura Journal of Linguistics and Literature (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jjll

Shintaviana, F. V., & Yudarwati, G. A. (2014). Konsep Diri serta Faktor-Faktor Pembentuk Konsep Diri Berdasarkan Teori Interaksionisme Simbolik.

Soares, E. (2020). PERAN PEMIMPIN INFORMAL PADA PRAKTIK TRADISI KORE-METAN DI DESA AITEAS, MUNICIPIO MANATUTO, TIMOR LESTE. In KRITIS (Issue 2).

Susanto, D., Jailani, Ms., & Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, U. (2023). Teknik Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data Dalam Penelitian Ilmiah. http://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/qosim

Wijayanto, Y. A., & Zulfiningrum, R. (2023). TIPE BUDAYA DAN IDENTITAS TEMBANG DOLANAN LIR-ILIR KARYA SUNAN KALIJAGA ANALISIS DENOTASI DAN KONOTASI. In Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi FIK Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Jl. Imam Bonjol No (Vol. 207).

Ximenes Joao. (2019). INTERKASI SOSIAL MASYARAKAT DALAM BUDAYA KORE METAN DI DESA TALITU KECAMATAN LAULARA KABUPATEN AILEU TIMOR LESTE.

Zanki, H. A. (n.d.). TEORI PSIKOLOGI DAN SOSIAL PENDIDIKAN (TEORI INTERAKSI SIMBOLIK). https://communication.binus.ac.id,

Zulfiningrum, R., Nuur, A., Dw, P., & Wahyono, E. (2020). MENUJU DIALOG DELIBERATIF RESOLUSI KONFLIK: SEBUAH STUDI KOMUNIKASI ANTARBUDAYA DI KAMPUNG ADAT JALASWATU.

Atmaja, F. D. (2021). INTERAKSI SIMBOLIK SISWA SMAN 1 TUBAN PASCA SISTEM KREDIT SEMESTER. Paradigma, 10(1), 1–15. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/view/38481

Baene, H. (2023). Tadisi Fotu Nina dalam Pembentukan Moral Keluarga. Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(4), 3–8.

Basuni, A. (2020). Peran Identitas Budaya Dalam Komunikasi Antarbudaya Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Subang. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 18–30.

Eviana. (2023). MAKNA SIMBOLIK SENI BEGALAN DALAM TRADISI PERNIKAHAN KABUPATEN BANYUMAS. 1–90. www.uinsaizu.ac.id

Jermias, E. O., & Rahman, A. (2022). Interaksionisme Simbolik pada Komunitas Cinema Appreciator Makassar di Kota Makassar. Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2(3), 1–10.

Kusherdyana. (2020). Pengertian Budaya, Lintas Budaya, dan Teori yang Melandasi Lintas Budaya.

Mahdayeni, Roihan Alhaddad, M., & Syukri Saleh, A. (2019). MANUSIA DAN KEBUDAYAAN. Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 1–14.

Rohayati. (2017). Budaya Komunikasi Masyarakat Maya (CYBER) : Suatu Proses Interaksi Simbolik. Sosial Budaya, 14(2), 1–11.

Susanto, D., & Risnita, J. (2023). Teknik Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data Dalam Penelitian Ilmiah. Pendidikan,Sosial & Humaniora, 1(1), 1–9. http://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/qosim

Tiyas, M. (2018). The Symbolic Meaning of the Udan Dawet Ritual in the Agricultural Community of Terkesi Selatan Village. Jurnal Komunikasi, 1–12. http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/CHANNEL%7CE:channel@comm.uad.ac.id

Wulandari, D. (2020). PROSES DAN PERAN KOMUNIKASI DALAM MENGATASI CULTURE SHOCK (STUDI KASUS PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS TADULAKO). 03(02), 1–20.

Zanki, A. (2020). TEORI PSIKOLOGI DAN SOSIAL PENDIDIKAN (TEORI INTERAKSI SIMBOLIK). Jurnal of Pedagogy, 3(2), 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles