Studi Komparatif Pemilihan Bentuk Pengaturan Tentang Model Penyusunan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia dan Malaysia
Comparative Study on the Choice of Regulatory Models for the Formulation of Corruption Crimes in the Anti-Corruption Laws of Indonesia and Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i1.19611Keywords:
Corruption, Legal Substance, ComparativeAbstract
Corruption in Indonesia has occurred at all levels of society as if corruption in Indonesia is never-ending to be discussed. Many law enforcers are involved in corruption, causing a community confidence crisis. Regardless, on the other hand, society is also apathetic and permissive towards criminal acts of corruption; society is also a contributor to corruption, especially in the implementation of the general and regional elections. It happens because of the perception that money politics is a natural thing in an imperfect democracy. This condition occurs because it is supported by the weak legal substance related to the crime of corruption. The weak legal substance is caused by legislative process errors, resulting in errors at the application and execution stages. So, it is necessary to examine the model of drafting laws related to the crime of corruption using normative juridical methods, namely analysing various laws related to the crime of corruption with a comparative approach by comparing the model of Indonesia's and Malaysia's anti-corruption laws drafting. The results showed that the drafting of corruption crimes in Indonesia is spread in several laws that can potentially cause disparities in justice. On the other hand, the drafting model of corruption crimes in Indonesia is carried out by separating the Criminal Code from the anti-corruption law, while in Malaysia, the drafting of the anti-corruption law is mutually reinforcing with the Penal Code.Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2008). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Kencana.
Arief, B. N. (2012). Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pudana dalam Peraturan Prundang-undangan. Pustaka Magister.
Agil Oktaryal dan Proborini Hastuti, Desain Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Partai Politik di Indonesia, Jurnal Integritas 7, No.1 (2021):1-22, DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.729
Angga Wijaya Holman Fasa dan Sofia Yuniar Sani, Sistem Manajemen Anti-Penyuapan ISO 37001:2016 dan Pencegahan Praktik Korupsi di Sektor Pelayanan Publik,6,No. 2 (2020); 187-208 DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v6i2.684
Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede, at.all. Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia, Law Reform, Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro Vol. 19 No.2, (2023): 248-269, DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.55819,
Budiyanto, et.all, Problems of Legal Implementation of the Criminal Offense of Spreading Fake News and Hate Speech in Papua, Law Reform, Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Vol. 20 No.2, (9 September 2024):278-300, DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i2.64881
Bunga, M., Dg Maroa, M., Arief, A., & Djanggih, H. (2019). URGENSI PERAN SERTA MASYARAKAT DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Law Reform, 15(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356
Cason, C. M., & Hefni, H. A. (2024). Clearing the Hurdle of Corruption: Indonesia’s Path to OECD Accession. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.379
Diamantina, A., & ALW, L. T. (2022). QUO VADIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM POLITIK UANG: POTRET PILKADA SERENTAK 2020 DI PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(3), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.3.2022.222-234
Edi Subkhan, Pendidikan Antikorupsi Perspektif Pedagogi Kritis, Jurnal Itegritas 6, No.1 (2020):15-30, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.649
Emma Valentina Teresha Senewe, Antonio Revivo, dan Ronny Adrie Maramis, Strengthening National Regulations in Combating CrossBorder Trafficking: Empirical Approach and the Way Forward, Hasanuddin Law Review, Fakultas Hukum Unhas, Volume 10 Issue 1, (April 2024): 108-118, DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4879
Eny Suastuti , Hayyan ul Haq, George Muishot , Tatiek Sri Djamiati , Firman Arif, Reconstruction of The Policy License for Tourism Businesses: Challenge and Opportunity for Social Welfare, Bestuur, Fakultas Hukum UNS, Vol.12, No.1, (August, 2024): 82-103, https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v12i1.80277
Friedman, L. M. (2015). Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial (7th ed.). Nusamedia.
Hamdhani, A. F., & Susilo, A. A. (2024). Local democracy and corruption: Economic-political relations in the corruption case of Batu City’s Mayor: Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1139
Hamzah, A. (1995). Delik-delik yang Tersebar di Luar KUHP dengan Komentar. Pradnya Paramita.
Hariman Satria, Kebijakan Kriminal Pencegahan Korupsi Pelayanan Publik, Jurnal Itegritas 6, No. 2 (2020) 169-186, DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v6i2.660
Hartati, Hafrida, Erwin, Arizyanto, R., & Saputra, B. (2024). Authority for Calculating State Economic Losses in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1480
Hidayat, S., Rodliyah, Amiruddin, A., & Parman, L. (2024). Reformulation of Certain Circumstances Indicator as a Prerequisite for the Imposition of Death Penalty in Corruption Crime. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1350
Ihab Natiq Khalid, Muhamad Sayuti Hassan, dan Muhammad Helmi Md Said, To Punish or Reintegrate? Balancing Legal Protection and the Future of the Child Terrorist, Brawajiya Law Joural, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): 100-125, DOI:http://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2024.011.02.05
Kartabrata, F. R. (2023). PENGUATAN PERAN PARTAI POLITIK DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 114/PUU-XX/2022. LITIGASI, 24(2), 229–260. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i2.9860
Kartiko, N. D. (2024). Does government effectiveness and corruption control support political stability? Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1209
Luthfi Hamzah Husin, Heroik Mutaqin Pratama, Wegik Prasetyo, Hendra, Wawan Budi Darmawan, Firman Manan, Feri Amsari, Malpraktik dan Korupsi Pemilu di Indonesia: Analisis terhadap Proses Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi pada Pemilu 2019, Jurnal Integritas 7, No.1 (2021): 57-78, DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.720
Maaliki, N. E., & Soponyono, E. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Berita Bohong. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.59-69
Mia Amiati, Taufik Rahman, R.B. Muhammad Cainal Abidin, Urgency of Falsum in Indonesian Criminal Justice System as Basis for Revision; An Islamic Perspective, Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata sosial, Fakultas Syariah IAIN Madura, Vol. 19 n0. 2 (2024):303-328, DOI https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i2.13141
Moch Edward Trias Pahlevi, Azka Abdi Amrurobbi, Pendidikan Politik dalam Pencegahan Politik UangMelalui Gerakan Masyarakat Desa, Jurnal Itegritas 6, No.1 (2020):141-152, DOI:https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1. 611
Rachmad, A., Ulya, Z., & Amdani, Y. (2022). Urgency of Extradition Agreements in Eradicating Corruption Crime in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.732
Ridwan, R. (2012). Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform, 8(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21456/vol%viss%ipp1-9
Ridwan, R. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan) (A. Senjaya, Ed.). Untirta Press.
Rizki Zakariya, Pencegahan Korupsi Melalui Optimalisasi Tata Kelola Rehabilitasi dan Pembangunan Ruang Kelas di Indonesia, Jurnal Itegritas 6, No.1 (2020):45-62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.641
Salfutra, R. D. (2018). Analisis Disparitas dan Rendahnya Vonis Perkara Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Tindak Pidana Korupsi PangkaL Pinang. In Studi Disparitas Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (pp. 147–148). Direktorat PJKAKI KPK RI.
Sambas, N., & Mahmud, A. (2022). MODEL PENEGAKAN HUKUM PROGRESIF DALAM PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA MELALUI PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI. Lex LATA, 2(3), 606. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v2i3.568
Sumaryati, Siti Murtiningsih, Siti Murtiningsih, Septiana Dwi Putri Maharani,” Penguatan Pendidikan Antikorupsi Perspektif Esensialisme, Jurnal Itegritas 6, No.1 (2020):1-14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.408
Schaffmeister, D., Keijzer, N., & Sutorius, E. Ph. (2011). Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Siagian, F. S., Lubis, A. H., Salwa, N. A., & Firouzfar, S. (2024). Justice based corruption eradication policy: A comparison between Indonesia and Denmark. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1134
Tantowi,Wildan., Saraswati ,N.G.A.N Ajeng., Gayatri, Viola Sekarayu,. Problematika Kebijakan Penegakan Hukuman Pidana Mati Untuk Koruptor Pada Masa Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19), Uir Law Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, (6 Mei 2021):49 49-58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(1).6123
Tongat, T. (2016). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pidana Nasional (Telaah Kritis Larangan Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana). Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 524. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1235
Trisusilowaty, D., Lumbanraja, A. D., & Suteki, S. (2019). FUNGSI PENGAWASAN OLEH INSPEKTORAT PENGAWASAN DAERAH BERBASIS PENGADUAN MASYARAKAT DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF. LAW REFORM, 15(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23353
Umam, A. K. (2024). Shadows of political corruption amidst the trend of declining democracy in Indonesia: Learning from the dynamics of 2024 Presidential Election. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1226
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LITIGASI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL LITIGASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.