Harmonisasi Sistem Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Tenggang Waktu Gugatan: Harmonizing the Administrative Court Legal System to Ensure Legal Certainty in the Administrative Lawsuit Time Limit

Fajar Ramadhan Kartabrata; Moch Erick Ernawan; Irfan Alfieansyah Dwinanda

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.26164

Authors

Fajar Ramadhan Kartabrata Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan
Moch Erick Ernawan Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan
Irfan Alfieansyah Dwinanda Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.26164

Keywords:

Legal Harmonization, Legal Certainty, Time Limit of Lawsuit, Administrative Decision, Administrative Court

Abstract

Individuals or private legal entities, as legal subjects, have the right to file a legal action against a beschikking or unilateral administrative decision, even when they are not explicitly named in such decision. Within the administrative court system, the time limit for filing a lawsuit serves as a formal mechanism to uphold the principle of legal certainty. However, the existing regulations particularly between the Administrative Court Law and the Government Administration Law remain inconsistent, resulting in legal uncertainty in the settlement of administrative disputes, especially for indirectly affected third parties. Using a statutory approach, this study analyzes the harmonization of Indonesia’s administrative court legal system to ensure legal certainty in determining the time limit for filing administrative lawsuits and proposes regulatory solutions through the formulation of a more coherent and implementable judicial regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhmad, M. Z. S. (2023). Implications of the Limits for Filing a Lawsuit to the State Administrative Court: Upholding Legal Certainty or Injuring Human Rights? Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68230

Albert Marvin, R., & Erliyana, A. (2019). Polemik Jangka Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2350

Alfons, S. S., Soplanit, M., & Mail, S. M. H. (2025). Creating Substantive Justice in State Administrative Courts: A Theoretical, Philosophical, and Human Rights Review. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 6(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p298-306

Aspani, B. (2019). Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Solusi Universitas Palembang, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v17i2.172

Azhar, I. (2021). Keberadaan Pihak Ketiga Wujud Keadilan Hukum Dalam Gugatan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kajian Putusan Nomor 41/K/TUN/1994. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i3.494

Bambang, S. (2010). Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan dalam Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum, 17(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art3

Bell, J. (2021). Sources of Dynamism in Modern Administrative Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa057

Dani, U. (2018). Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia : Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction atau Duality Of Jursidiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur dan Karakteristiknya. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.405-424

Donny Widianto, & Zainal Arifin Hoesein. (2024). Positivism Theory in the Context of Modern Legal Thought. International Journal of Law and Society, 1(4), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v1i4.204

Dwi Safitri, E., & Sa’adah, N. (2021). Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45

Efendi, J. (2024). Application of Procedural Justice vis a vis Substantive Justice in Law Enforcement. Arena Hukum, 17(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01702.3

Fadlil Sumadi, A. (2013). Politik Hukum Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Setara Press.

Fahresi, F. dkk. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Administratif Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tenang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, IX(8).

Hanitijo S., R. (1990). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.

Harahap, Z. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara : Edisi Revisi. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Jaelani, A. K. (2019). Implementasi Daluarsa Gugatan Dalam Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v18i2.1090

Julyanto, M., & Yuli Sulistyawan, A. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepio, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22

Kuswan Hadji, Devina Angelica, Efi Lailatun Nisfah, Erlingga Savril Maharani, Herfita Ayu Nayla, & Clara Oktaviana. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Tata Negara. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i3.851

Latifiani, D., & Ilyasa, R. M. A. (2021). The Position of Moral Values in Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 6(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.51-61

Magnis Suseno, F. (2001). Etika Politik Prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Maryadi, M. (2022). Signifikasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Wilayah Provinsi Maluku Utara. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(3), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss3.art15

Mertokusumo, S. (1997). Penemuan Hukum (Sebuah Pengantar).

Minda Yuda, T. D. (2023). The principle of legal certainty concerning the implementation of legalization according to the apostille convention viewed from an international civil law perspective. International Journal of Latin Notary, 3(02). https://doi.org/10.61968/journal.v3i02.62

Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349

Prayogo. (2018). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i2.151

Priyambodo, B. (2011). Politik Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mahardika Parahyangan Press.

Samusevich. (2022). Indefinite Deadlines in the Administrative Process: Problems of Implementation. Prologue Law Journal, 2. https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.2.5.

Setyowati, H. (2021). The Judges Ethics and Justice: An Analysis of Law Enforcement in Indonesian Court System. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i4.48183

Sirojudin, M. R. (2022). Administrative Appeal Efforts in Indonesian Administrative Dispute Resolution After the Government Administration Law (Pre-Omnibus Law). Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective, 2(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v2i2.6251

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukri, I. F., & Erliyana, A. (2022). Konsep Pelaksanaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara: Menguji Asas Presumtio Iustae Causa Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no1.3323

Susanti, E. (2009). Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Sebagai Media Pengawasan Masyarakat Untuk Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Bersih dan Berwibawa. Risalah Hukum, 5.

Triuwulan, T. dan G. W. , I. (2010). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Kencana.

Yunantyo dan Unu. (2021). Permasalahan Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Gugatan Oleh Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tata Usaha Negara. Ilmu Hukum, 22. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.271

Zamzami, A., & Muslim, S. (2023). Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat. Widya Yuridika, 6(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i3.4530