SISTEM ONLINE PADA TRANSAKSI PEMBAYARAN JASA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

Penulis

  • Raden Ajeng Astari Sekarwati Universitas Padjajaran
  • Nyulistiowati Suryanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung
  • Anita Afriana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i1.4416

Abstrak

The allegation of monopolistic practices by PT.O and I Gusti Ngurah Rai Airport, which only provides one online-based service payment system, has resulted in losses, including many people who are unable to make payments due to the lack of payment system options, as well as making it difficult for other business actors to enter their market. This creates issues, such as how to construct an online system for service payment transactions and how to apply the principle of balance in internet-based service payment transactions. The research was descriptive analytical in nature, describing the applicable laws and regulations, as well as legal theories and practices in the implementation of the problems studied. The approach method used was a qualitative normative approach, i.e. research conducted with a departure from the normative juridical aspect, which was then qualitatively analyzed by referring to relevant theories and principles. The findings of the study show that 1) By regulating payment services at these malls, PT. O collaborates with Lippo Group to form a single payment system that results in economic centralization by preventing other business actors from joining and carrying out their business activities. Meanwhile, G cooperates with certain airports to be the only platform for providing application-based public transportation and only provides one payment system that has been determined by G, thus preventing other business actors from entering the market and is proven to have violated Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition; and 2) In the instance of Lippo Group (PT.O) and I Gusti Ngurah Rai Airport, the principle of balance is not applied by business actors in online-based service payment transactions. This is exhibited by the appointment of only one business actor to carry out activities, demonstrating that other business actors are not granted business prospects in that market.   Keywords: Principle of Balance; Online Payment; Business Competition.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Biografi Penulis

Nyulistiowati Suryanti, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung

Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung

Anita Afriana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD) Bandung

Referensi

Beritabali.com. (2020). KPPU akan Dalami Dugaan Monopoli G di Bandara Ngurah Rai. Beritabali.Com. https://www.news.beritabali.com/read/2020/01/28/ 202001280011/kppu-akan-dalami-dugaan-monopoli-grab-di-bandara-ngurah-rai

Diah, M. M., & Emirzon, J. (2003). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia (Perjanjian yang Dilarang, Perbuatan Bisnis yang Dilarang, dan Posisi Dominan yang Dilarang). Unsri. Inderalaya.

Hartono, S. (1982). Hukum Ekonomi Pembangunan Indonesia. Bina Cipta.

Hartono, S. (2000). Business and the Legal Profession in an Age of Computerization and Globalization, Yayasan Hak Asasi Manusia, Demokrasi dan Supremasi Hukum. PT. Alumni.

Iriana, C. B. (2021). Analisis Penerapan Asas Keseimbangan pada Putusan Perkara No. 22/KPPU-I/2016 tentang Kasus Pelanggaran Perjanjian Tertutup dan Penguasaan oleh PT. Tirta Investama dan PT. Balina Agung Perkasa dengan PT. Tirta Fresindo Jaya di KPPU. Gorontalo Law Review, 14(1), 138–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v4i1.1499

Ismanthono, H. W. (2006). Kamus Istilah Ekonomi Populer. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Nugroho, S. A. (2012). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dalam Teori Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya (1st ed.). Kencana.

Pakpahan, N. S. (1994). Pokok-Pokok Pikiran tentang Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Proyek Pengembangan Hukum Ekonomi dan Penyempurnaan Sistem Pengadaan, Kantor ….

Primandhika, M. P., & Artha, I. G. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Pendekatan Rule of Reason dan Per Se Illegal terhadap Kasus Kartel di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 6(7), 5–7.

Triadi, G. D., Kosasih, J. I., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Perjanjian Oligopoli dan Asas Keseimbangan dalam Persaingan Usaha Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Business Competition Based on Law Numbe 5 of 1999. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.22225/jkh.1.1.2140

Yani, A., & Widjaja, G. (2002). Anti Monopoli. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

File Tambahan

Telah diserahkan

2021-08-24

Diterima

2022-04-04

Diterbitkan

2022-04-22

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles