KOMPARASI PENGGUNAAN ANALYSIS REGULATORY METHOD SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENDUKUNG KEBIJAKAN DALAM PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.6128Abstract
The promulgation of laws has been stipulated in Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Guidelines for the Promulgation of Laws, which has been changed post enactment of Law Number 13 of 2022 on Second Amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011, one of which is the application of the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) and the Rule, Opportunity, Capacity, Communication, Interest, Process Method, and Ideology (ROCCIPI) as the basis for the Establishment of Legal Products in e Academic Manuscript of the Bill of Law/Regional Regulation. Integrating the methods into Academic Manuscripts is incorrect considering that it serves as the justification (philosophical, sociological, and juridical) which is academic or scientific in nature upon the conclusion of Laws and Regional Regulations. (RIA) is an analysis method of policies that acts as a companion to academic manuscripts called the RIA Statement. This is interesting to study of how is the development of the RIA and ROCCIPI in promulgating laws? How do the techniques for preparing academic manuscripts pre and post the enactment of Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 compare?
Keywords: Regulatory Impact Analysis; Rule, Opportunity, Capacity, Communication, Interest, Process, and Ideology; Legal Products.
Downloads
References
Arifi Hoesein, Z. (2012). Pembentukan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 1(3).
Biro Hukum Kementerian. (2011). Kajian Ringkas Pengembangan dan Implementasi Metode Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) Untuk Menilai Kebijakan (Peraturan Dan Non Peraturan) Di Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. Kementerian PPN.
Hanitijo S., R. (1990). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Huda, N. (2005). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kurniawan, T., Muslim, M. A., & Sakapurnama, E. (2018). Regulatory impact assessment and its challenges: An empirical analysis from Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.004
Lopulalan, Dicky, Ahmad, & Gulam, R. (2007). 9 Jurus Merancang Peraturan untuk Transformasi Sosial Sebuah manual untuk Praktisi. KPSHK.
Mahaendra Wijaya, G. (2016). Metodelogi dan Bahasa Perundang-Undangan.
Manan, B. (1992). Dasar-dasar Perundang-undangan Indonesia . Ind-Hill. Co.
N. Dunn, W. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Hanindita Graha Widya.
Nurseppy, I., Paryadi, & Ray, D. (2002). Pedoman Kaji Ulang Peraturan Indonesia.
Seidman, A., Seidman, R., & Abeyserkere, N. (2001). Penyusunan Rancangan Undang Undang Dalam Perubahan Masyarakat Yang Demokrtis: Sebuah Panduan Untuk Pembuat Rancangan Undang Undang. Elips.
Setya Wardani, R., Dwi Winarko, D., Rudyanto, B., Hernandi, & Harefa, M. (2008). Metode Analisis Dampak Regulasi Di Lingkungan DPR-RI. Sekretariat Jendral DPR RI.
Suska. (2012). Prinsip Regulatory Impact Assessment dalam Proses Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sesuai UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(2).
Trijono, R. (2012). Alternatif Model Analisis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 1(3).
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © 2025 Jurnal LITIGASI (e-Journal).
Jurnal LITIGASI (e-Journal) adopts the CC-BY license as the optimal license for publishing, distributing, using, and reusing scholarly work. Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
