PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN KONSTRUKTIVISME UNTUK MEMBANGUN PEMAHAMAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAS SISWA KELAS VI SDIT AR-RAYU

Authors

  • Jehan Nisak Nasution MPDR FKIP Universitas Terbuka
  • Ryan Dwi Puspita Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.27142

Keywords:

IPAS Content sixth grade, Constructivist Approach, Building Understanding

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of the constructivist approach to build understanding among sixth-grade students at SDIT Ar-Rayu. The constructivist approach emphasizes that knowledge is not obtained passively but is actively constructed by students through direct experiences, exploration, social interaction, and reflection on the learning processes they undergo, particularly in the IPAS subject on the six continents of the world. In this learning model, the teacher acts as a facilitator who creates an open learning environment that supports students’ active engagement. This study used a descriptive method with data collection techniques including classroom observation, interviews, and documentation throughout the learning process. With a total of 23 students, the results showed that 87% of students became more active in the learning process, 82% demonstrated increased curiosity, and 78% were able to connect new knowledge with previous experiences. Learning strategies such as problem-based learning, small group discussions, experiments, and open-ended questioning encouraged students to think critically, express their opinions, and develop more meaningful understanding of the lesson content. In addition, 85% of students showed improvement in social skills such as collaboration and communication. The teacher played a key role as a facilitator in designing meaningful activities and promoting student exploration. Therefore, it can be concluded that the consistent and well-planned implementation of the constructivist approach is effective in improving the quality of students' understanding and creating a student-centered learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (2019).

In search of understanding:

The case for constructivist

classrooms. Pearson.

Fitriani, R., & Marlina, L. (2020).

Implementasi pembelajaran

konstruktivisme dalam

meningkatkan pemahaman

siswa pada mata pelajaran

matematika. Jurnal

Pendidikan dan

Pembelajaran, 8(2), 95-108.

Handayani, D., & Pratama, A. (2023).

Pembelajaran berbasis

konstruktivisme untuk

meningkatkan partisipasi

siswa di sekolah dasar.

Jurnal Pendidikan Abad 21,

6(1), 112-123.

Ismail, H., & Nugroho, I. (2019). Peran

guru sebagai fasilitator

dalam pembelajaran

berbasis konstruktivisme.

Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar,

10(4), 45-60.

Kurniasih, E., & Sani, D. (2019).

Konstruktivisme dalam

pendidikan: Membentuk

pemahaman dan

keterampilan siswa abad 21.

Jurnal Pendidikan Abad 21,

4(2), 142-155.

Mutmainnah, F., & Andayani, S.

(2022). Pengaruh

pendekatan konstruktivisme

terhadap keterampilan

berpikir kritis siswa di SD.

Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan

Inovasi, 15(1), 54-67.

Rosita, R., Safitri, R. D., Suwarma, D.

M., Muyassaroh, I., & Jenuri,

J. (2023). Pendekatan

Konstruktivisme Terhadap

Peningkatan Hasil Belajar

Siswa SD. Jurnal Review

Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal

Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil

Penelitian, 10(3), 238–247.

Sanjaya, W. (2021). Strategi

Pembelajaran Berorientasi

Standar Proses Pendidikan.

Jakarta: Kencana.

Suparno, H. (2014). Konstruktivisme

dalam pendidikan: Teori,

konsep, dan aplikasi.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in

society: The development of

higher psychological

processes. Harvard

University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-08

Most read articles by the same author(s)