EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN PEMBIAYAAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: IMPLIKASI BAGI KESETARAAN SOSIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.27718Keywords:
higher education funding, social equity, public policy, education accessAbstract
Abstract Higher education is a strategic instrument for promoting social mobility and national development. However, inequality in access due to uneven funding policies poses a serious challenge to achieving social equity. This article evaluates higher education funding policies in Indonesia through a literature review, focusing on BOPTN, KIP-K, and UKT schemes. The findings indicate the persistence of structural and socio-economic barriers that exclude vulnerable groups. Policies have not fully ensured social equity due to disparities in resource distribution, transparency, and implementation effectiveness. Reform grounded in social justice and enhanced monitoring systems is needed. This study contributes to the development of a more inclusive and equitable higher education policy. Keywords: higher education funding, social equity, public policy, education accessDownloads
References
Bappenas. (2022). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020–2024. Jakarta: Kementerian PPN.
BPS. (2022). Statistik Pendidikan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Chapman, B., & Higgins, T. (2018). Income-contingent loans: Theory, practice and prospects. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 21(3), 203–222.
DOAJ. (2024). Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved from https://www.doaj.org
Fitriani, R., & Sulaiman, M. (2020). Transparansi penetapan UKT di perguruan tinggi negeri. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 14(1), 45–60.
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harjanto, T. (2019). Ketimpangan akses pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia: Sebuah tinjauan geografis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembangunan, 7(2), 134–148.
Johnstone, D. B. (2004). The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education. Comparative Education Review, 48(4), 403–425.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Permendikbud No. 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Satuan Biaya Operasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
Lestari, I. (2021). Evaluasi implementasi KIP Kuliah di perguruan tinggi negeri. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(1), 66–78.
Nugroho, Y. (2021). Peran CSR dalam pembiayaan pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 18(2), 123–135.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rizqi, F., & Andini, M. (2022). Analisis ketimpangan UKT dan efektivitas KIP Kuliah. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 9(1), 23–38.
Setiawan, A., & Fadilah, N. (2022). Distribusi BOPTN dan ketimpangan antar wilayah. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 13(3), 205–217.
Simanjuntak, D. (2023). Pendidikan tinggi untuk daerah 3T: Strategi afirmasi dan tantangannya. Jurnal Pembangunan Regional, 5(1), 90–103.
Susanti, R. (2020). Akses mahasiswa miskin terhadap pendidikan tinggi: Studi evaluatif program KIP-K. Jurnal Kependidikan, 8(1), 56–68.
Wahyudi, A., & Nirmala, L. (2021). Kesenjangan akses pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 11(2), 89–105.
World Bank. (2021). Rethinking tertiary education financing in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Yuliani, F., & Prabowo, H. (2023). Peran data terpadu dalam pembiayaan pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 145–157.
Yusof, H., Ahmad, S., & Latif, R. A. (2020). Financing higher education in Malaysia: The role of PTPTN. Asian Education Studies, 5(1), 37–46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
