IDENTIFIKASI KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF SISWA BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL-SOAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN IDENTITAS TRIGONOMETRI DI SMA NEGERI 4 JAYAPURA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.35644Keywords:
cognitive ability, learning style, trigonometryAbstract
Mathematics has a very important role in training students' cognitive abilities to think logically, systematically, and analytically. One of the topics in mathematics that requires a deep understanding is Trigonometry Identity. However, not all students have the same ability to solve trogonometry problems, because there are differences in learning styles that affect the way students understand and process information. In the context of Trigonometric Identity learning, these differences in learning styles can be a factor that affects students' cognitive abilities. This suggests that a uniform approach to learning is not always effective for all students. Therefore, it is important to identify students' cognitive abilities based on their learning styles, so that a more appropriate and effective learning model can be designed. Based on interviews with teachers at SMA Negeri 4 Jayapura, many students experienced difficulties in solving trigonometry problems. This can be caused by the incompatibility between the teaching model used and the student's learning style. By understanding students' cognitive abilities in the context of their learning styles, it is hoped that a more appropriate and effective learning model can be designed. This study aims to identify students' cognitive abilities based on learning styles in solving trigonometric identity subject problems. This research is a descriptive research using a qualitative approach. The data collection technique used learning style questionnaires, written tests and interviews. Based on the results of the research, the V14 Subjects have the cognitive ability to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create quite well. Subject A36, only has the cognitive ability to apply and evaluate. K43 subjects, only have the ability to understand, apply, and evaluate. The results of this research are expected to contribute to the development of a Differentiated Learning Model.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longman.
Fererde, P. L., Rubillos, M. A., & Dumasig, M. T. (2024). Effectiveness of Contextual Mathematical Modeling Approach in Teaching Trigonometric Concepts. International Journal of Secondary Education, 12(4), 159–165. https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241204.15
Hatip, A., & Setiawan, W. (2021). Teori kognitif Bruner dalam pembelajaran matematika. PHI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 95–102.
Husain, H. (2022). Pengaruh model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik kelas XI MIPA SMAN 1 Kalukku. Chemistry Education Review, 3(2), 112–119.
Jelatu, S., Ishak, A., & Pageh, M. S. (2019). Effect of Think Pair Share Model Assisted by Android-Based Learning Media on Mathematical Understanding Ability of Students Viewed from Cognitive Style. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 529–538. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1230123
Miles, Mathew B. and Huberman, A. Michael. Analisis Data Kualitatif. diterjemahkan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. 1992. Jakarta: Penerbit UI.
Prasetyo, E., Sari, D., & Rahman, A. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 45-52.
Rahmawati, N., & Supriyadi, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 123-130.
Samala, N., Fatimah, A., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Konsep pembelajaran dalam konteks pendidikan abad 21. Jurnal Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 1245–1252.
Sari, R., Hidayati, N., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memahami Identitas Trigonometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(3), 201-210.
Setiawan, B., & Hidayati, N. (2023). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11(1), 75-82.
Sheromova, L., Abilkasimova, A., Shulenbayeva, T., & Abenova, K. (2021). Development of general learning skills in teaching mathematics to students with different learning styles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(17), 41–58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284651.pdf
Silitonga, E., & Ina. (2020). Gaya Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Cikokol 2 Tangerang. PENSA : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial , 17-22.
Sirampun, E. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Pada Materi Segitiga. Journal on Education, 06(03), 17937–17948. https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/5726%0Ahttps://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/download/5726/4604
Solihah, S., Kartono, K., Dwijanto, D., & Mariani, S. (2021). Pemahaman Konseptual dan Prosedural Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana, 489, 85–87. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/827
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
















