Perbandingan Proses Peradilan HAM Internasional dan Nasional: Studi atas Efektivitas dan Implementasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.35953Keywords:
Keywords: Human Rights Court; International Court; National Court; Effectiveness of Human Rights Enforcement; Implementation of Decisions; International Criminal Court; Human Rights; Judicial Synergy; Human Rights Law Enforcement; Comparative StudyAbstract
The enforcement of human rights (HAM) is a crucial component of the global legal system, ensuring justice for victims of human rights violations. International and national human rights courts differ in their strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness. This study aims to compare the two mechanisms, using case studies of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and several national systems. The ICC has the authority to handle serious violations such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Its strengths lie in its independence and cross-border reach, but it is hampered by political support and limited resources. In contrast, national courts are more responsive to local conditions, but are often hampered by political interference, weak institutional capacity, and legal inconsistencies. This undermines public trust in national systems. The study concludes that collaboration between international and national courts is crucial for strengthening human rights enforcement. Strengthening coordination, legal harmonization, and enhancing the capacity of national institutions are necessary for the effective implementation of international decisions. Global political support is also a determining factor in increasing the effectiveness of human rights courts and providing justice for victims of violations.
Downloads
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2022). International human rights. Oxford University Press.
Amnesty International. (2023). Annual report 2022/2023: The state of the world’s human rights. Amnesty International Ltd.
Arifin, Z. (2021). Penguatan lembaga peradilan HAM nasional dalam perspektif keadilan transisional. Jurnal HAM, 12(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.101-120
Clark, R. S. (2020). The development of international criminal law and justice. Cambridge University Press.
Darmawan, R., & Suryani, T. (2021). Tantangan implementasi Undang-Undang Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.2914
Human Rights Watch. (2024). World report 2024: Events of 2023. Human Rights Watch.
Huneeus, A. (2020). International criminal law by other means: The quasi-criminal jurisdiction of human rights bodies. American Journal of International Law, 114(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.66
Kadir, A., & Rahman, N. (2022). Efektivitas hukum nasional dalam penegakan pelanggaran HAM berat di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 11(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i2.1145
Kellman, B. (2021). Crimes of state past and present: Prevention, recognition, and punishment. Routledge.
Komnas HAM. (2012). Laporan tahunan pelanggaran HAM berat Timor Timur. Komnas HAM.
Mas’ud, F. (2019). Implikasi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak terhadap pekerja anak. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 11–19.
Nugroho, D. (2022). Analisis perbandingan antara Mahkamah HAM Internasional dan Pengadilan HAM Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Global, 8(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.35795/jhg.v8i3.1194
Sefriani. (2020). Hukum internasional: Suatu pengantar. Rajawali Pers.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Wibisono, Y. (2021). Penegakan hukum HAM berat di Indonesia: Antara harapan dan kenyataan. Jurnal Hukum & HAM, 5(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/jh.v5i1.21200
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
