Landasan Filosofis dalam Pengembangan Teknologi Pendidikan untuk Peningkatan Literasi Digital Peserta Didik

Authors

  • Arie Ekayudhistira Kirana Tejawati Universitas Mulawarman
  • Winaryati Universitas Mulawarman
  • Syalma Faradila Nur Universitas Mulawarman
  • Warman Universitas Mulawarman
  • Dwi Nugroho Hidayanto Universitas Mulawarman
  • Muhammad Amir Masruhim Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.36149

Keywords:

educational technology, digital literacy, philosophical foundations, students, digital ethics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of philosophical foundations in the development of educational technology on improving students’ digital literacy. A quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design was employed, involving 360 senior high school students in Samarinda. The research instrument consisted of two main variables philosophical foundations of educational technology and digital literacy measured using a 1–5 Likert scale. Simple linear regression was used to determine the effect between variables. The results indicate that students possess a high level of understanding regarding the philosophical dimensions of educational technology, including humanism, constructivism, digital ethics, and educational values. Meanwhile, students’ digital literacy levels were also categorized as good, although slightly lower than their philosophical understanding. Regression analysis revealed a very strong influence of the philosophical foundations on digital literacy, with an R² value of 0.8022 and p < 0.001. These findings highlight that integrating philosophical values into the development and use of educational technology significantly contributes to enhancing students’ digital competencies. Therefore, educational technology requires not only technical proficiency but also an understanding of values, ethics, and meaning to ensure its reflective, critical, and responsible use in digital learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (trans. MB Ramos). New York: Continuum, 2005.

Good Education in an Age of Measurement. (n.d.).

Hadiyastama, M. F., Nurwahidin, M., & Yulianti, D. (2022). Peran teknologi pendidikan dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik Indonesia, 2(1), 11–18.

Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences. Edits publishers.

Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79.

Kemdikbud, R. I. (2022). Kurikulum merdeka: Panduan pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen [Independent curriculum: Christian Religious Education learning guide]. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (Vol. 30). Peter Lang.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2018). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.

Mihas, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education.

Postman, N. (2011). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage.

Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know. International Society for technology in Education.

Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Soßdorf, A., Stein, C., Bezzaoui, I., & Fegert, J. (2024). Literacies against Fake News: examining the Role of Data Literacy and Critical Media Literacy to Counteract Disinformation. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift Für Theorie Und Praxis Der Medienbildung, 59, 55–76.

Suzer, E., & Koc, M. (2024). Teachers’ digital competency level according to various variables: A study based on the European DigCompEdu framework in a large Turkish city. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 22057–22083.

Van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-13

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 04 (2025): Volume 10 No. 04 Desember 2025 Published

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>