Integrasi Nilai Inklusivitas dan Kesetaraan Gender dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SMP: Strategi, Implementasi, dan Asesmen

Authors

  • Yulia Isnaeni Universitas PGRI Indraprasta Jakarta
  • Salma Farah Nabillah Universitas PGRI Indraprasta Jakarta
  • Nina Kartina Universitas PGRI Indraprasta Jakarta
  • Dr. Rosynanda Nur Fauziah Universitas PGRI Indraprasta Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.37468

Keywords:

Inclusivity, Gender Equality, Mathematics Learning, Independent Curriculum, Inclusive Assesment

Abstract

Mathematics education at the junior high school level plays an important role in building critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration skills in the 21st century era. Although mathematical abilities between genders tend to be equal, students' learning experiences in Indonesia are still influenced by social stereotypes, limitations of adaptive teaching media, and potentially biased assessment designs. This article aims to map and develop a framework for mathematics learning strategies that support inclusivity and gender equality in the context of teacher innovation in the Independent Curriculum. The research uses a systematic literature review approach with thematic-narrative synthesis. The literature was collected from international and national scientific databases, selected in stages using the full text identification–screening–feasibility flow, and reviewed for quality through a methodological checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were analyzed through open and axial coding to produce key themes including differentiation (content-process-product), heterogeneous collaborative learning with non-gender role rotation, use of neutral context in the questions, and adaptive authentic assessment design that assesses thought processes and group contributions. Key findings confirm that gender inclusion and equity in mathematics are determined more by the structure of application and design of learning experiences than by differences in basic abilities. Practically, this article offers a contribution in the form of a prototype teacher toolkit that includes a checklist of bias-free materials and questions (aspects of language, context, role, and name representation), operational examples of SPLDV differentiation tasks (visual–numeric–verbal), as well as a 4C-based assessment rubric model and equality reflection. The implication is that teachers can directly use adaptive OER and bias check instruments in module planning, while schools and policy makers such as BSKAP and the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education of the Republic of Indonesia can strengthen support through micro-training, practitioner communities, and improvement of the assessment ecosystem in education units.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeqdad, Qais I., Ali M. Alodat, Mahmoud F. Alquraan, Mohammad A. Mohaidat, and Alaa K. Al-Makhzoomy. 2023. “The Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.” Cogent Education 10(1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191.

Boateng, Samuel, Gilbert Kalonde, and Claudia Duedu. 2025. “A Universal Design for Learning Framework for Inclusive Primary Mathematics in Ghana: Adaptation and Implementation.” OALib 12(09):1–16. doi:10.4236/oalib.1113596.

Boelens, Ruth, Bram De Wever, and Michiel Voet. 2017. “Four Key Challenges to the Design of Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature Review.” Educational Research Review 22:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001.

Bondie, Rhonda S., Christine Dahnke, and Akane Zusho. 2019. “How Does Changing ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching?” Review of Research in Education 43(1):336–62. doi:10.3102/0091732X18821130.

BSKAP. 2022. “PERUBAHAN ATAS KEPUTUSAN MENTERI PENDIDIKAN, KEBUDAYAAN, RISET, DAN TEKNOLOGI NOMOR 56/M/2022 TENTANG PEDOMAN PENERAPAN DALAM RANGKA PEMULIHAN PEMBELAJARAN.”

Flore, Paulette C., and Jelte M. Wicherts. 2015. “Does Stereotype Threat Influence Performance of Girls in Stereotyped Domains? A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of School Psychology 53(1):25–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002.

Fointuna, D. W., and C. Riegle-Crumb. 2025. “Towards Gender Equality in STEM Fields: Gender Similarities in Students’ Mathematical Literacy.” International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education 9(1):86. doi:10.20961/ijpte.v9i1.99015.

Hetty Marhaeni, Nafida, Rohmatul Fajriyah, Bayu Suseno, and Nanang Khuzaini. 2025. Jurnal Silogisme STUDI GENDER DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH: APAKAH ADA KETIMPANGAN? Vol. 10. Bulan Juni. http://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/silogisme.

Inglis, Matthew, and Steven O’Hagan. 2022. “Stereotype Threat, Gender and Mathematics Attainment: A Conceptual Replication of Stricker & Ward.” PLoS ONE 17(5 May). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267699.

Isnaniah, and M. Imamuddin. 2020. “Students’ Understanding of Mathematical Concepts Using Manipulative Learning Media in Elementary Schools.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1471(1):012050. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012050.

Melhem, Duaa Zahi, and Ali Muhammad Al-Zoubi. 2025. “The Effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)-Based VARK Model in Students with Learning Difficulties and Various Learning Preferences.” Educational Process International Journal 15(1). doi:10.22521/edupij.2025.15.152.

Moleko, Matshidiso Mirriam, and Mncedisi Christian Maphalala. 2025a. “Teachers’ Experiences in Using Universal Design for Learning in Primary Mathematics Classrooms: Professed Benefits.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research 7(s1):a03. doi:10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.s1.03.

Moleko, Matshidiso Mirriam, and Mncedisi Christian Maphalala. 2025b. “Teachers’ Experiences in Using Universal Design for Learning in Primary Mathematics Classrooms: Professed Benefits.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research 7(s1):a03. doi:10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.s1.03.

Nirwana, Rofiqoh, Aisyah Indy Hidayati, Firdausy Assayyidah Ifcha, Sayyidah Fatimah Azzahra, Adinda Sayyidah, and Rofiqotul Jannah. 2024. PENILAIAN DALAM KURIKULUM MERDEKA: MENDUKUNG PEMBELAJARAN ADAPTIF DAN BERPUSAT PADA SISWA MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH. Vol. 02.

Olsson, Jenny, Stephanie Olsson, and Anna Jobér. 2018. A Bachelor Thesis and a Minor Field Study 15 Credits, Advanced Level Gender within an Indonesian Mathematics Classroom Genus i Ett Indonesiskt Matematikklassrum.

Salsabila, Indri, Anisa Rohmah Hasanah, Hendriyan Ihsan Mutakin, and Triana Lestari. 2024. “Gender Inclusiveness in Student Learning Materials: Study of Elementary School Context in Indonesia.” HUMANIKA 24(1):27–46. doi:10.21831/hum.v24i1.67333.

Salsabila, Indri, Anisa Rohmah Hasanah, Hendriyan Ihsan Mutakin, and Triana Lestari. 2024. “Gender Inclusiveness in Student Learning Materials: Study of Elementary School Context in Indonesia.” 24(1):27–46. doi:10.21831/hum.v24i1.67333.27-46.

Sonang Siregar, Pariang, and Hendra Sofyan. 2023. “Differentiation Learning Models in Mathematics: A Review of Literature.” PPSDP International Journal of Education 2(2):360–76.

Thoma, Colleen A., Lauren Bruno, Jarrod Hobson, Joshua P. Taylor, LaRon A. Scott, Monica Grillo, Michelle Hicks, and Regina H. Frazier. 2022. “Development of an Online Professional Development Module to Support Special Educators in Implementing the Universal Design for Transition Framework.” Creative Education 13(07):2321–39. doi:10.4236/ce.2022.137148.

Tomlinson, Carol Ann. 2017. Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades.

Trisnani, Novy, Heri Retnawati, and Wuri Wuryandani. 2025a. “Diverse Students in Mathematics Classrooms: Capturing Differentiated Instruction by Indonesian Elementary Teachers.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 46(2). doi:10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.20.

Trisnani, Novy, Heri Retnawati, and Wuri Wuryandani. 2025b. “Diverse Students in Mathematics Classrooms: Capturing Differentiated Instruction by Indonesian Elementary Teachers.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 46(2). doi:10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.20.

Wang, Ning, Aik Ling Tan, Xiaohong Zhou, Ke Liu, Feng Zeng, and Jiong Xiang. 2023. “Gender Differences in High School Students’ Interest in STEM Careers: A Multi-Group Comparison Based on Structural Equation Model.” International Journal of STEM Education 10(1). doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00443-6.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-27