IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM MELALUI STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN BERDIFERENSIASI DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA (SMP)

(Studi Kasus di SMPN 3 Rancaekek Kabupaten Bandung)

Authors

  • Ima Mulhima Prihatini Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • R. Supyan Sauri Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Kokom Komalasari Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Yulidar Yulidar Universitas Islam Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38101

Keywords:

Implementation, Deep Learning, Differentiated Learning

Abstract

The learning process in schools needs to transform from a traditional teacher-centered model to one that encourages students to achieve deeper and more meaningful understanding. Deep learning requires students to go beyond memorization, but to actively construct knowledge, connecting concepts. In line with these challenges, differentiated learning has emerged as a relevant and effective pedagogical strategy. The purpose of this study was to obtain information and analyze the implementation of deep learning through differentiated learning strategies in junior high schools (SMP), focusing on the planning process, implementation, evaluation, follow-up plans, and obstacles and solutions encountered. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study method. The results illustrate that in the planning stage (Plan), starting with an analysis of student learning needs, setting learning objectives and outcomes, designing content differentiation, processes, and products, and finally planning classroom management. The implementation phase (Do) begins with differentiation based on readiness, interests, and learning profiles, the implementation of active, collaborative, and student-centered learning, and reflection and consolidation of understanding. The evaluation phase (Check) includes evaluation of the learning process, learning outcomes, learning impact, and teacher performance in implementing differentiated learning. The follow-up phase (Act) begins with revising the lesson plan based on the evaluation results, providing remedial and enrichment sessions, and providing school support for quality improvement. Challenges faced include significant differences in learning readiness, limited learning time, and impaired concentration and classroom management. Solutions to address these challenges include adjusting learning strategies based on evaluation results, implementing remedial and enrichment sessions, and strengthening classroom management and student engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. Falmer Press.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.

Creswell (Agustini et al, 2023). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design.

Guskey, T. R. (1985). Implementing mastery learning. Journal of Educational Leadership, 43(5), 14–21.

Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “learning for mastery”. Phi Delta Kappan.

Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners, Grades 3–12. Free Spirit Publishing.

Moleong, L. J. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. Cetakan Ke 41.

Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model. Creative Learning Press.

Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25