MENAVIGASI ERA AI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS TERHADAP TANTANGAN, DAMPAK, DAN RESPON INSTITUSIONAL UNTUK MENJAGA INTEGRITAS AKADEMIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38607Keywords:
kecerdasan buatan generatif, integritas akademik, pendidikan tinggiAbstract
Kemunculan Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif (Generative AI) menantang integritas akademik di perguruan tinggi, namun sintesis empiris yang sistematis masih kurang. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) ini menganalisis 22 artikel empiris untuk mengatasi celah tersebut. Temuan menunjukkan tiga tema kunci: adopsi AI yang meluas untuk efisiensi; dilema signifikan bagi integritas akademik ('aigiarism'); dan konsensus tentang ketidakcukupan kebijakan institusional, yang mendorong pergeseran strategis ke arah inovasi pedagogis dan pelatihan AI literacy. Tinjauan ini menyimpulkan bahwa institusi harus beralih dari larangan reaktif ke strategi proaktif, termasuk kebijakan yang jelas, redesain pedagogis, dan pelatihan AI literacy komprehensif untuk menavigasi era baru.
Downloads
References
BAİDOO-ANU, David, and Leticia OWUSU ANSAH. 2023. “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning.” Journal of AI 7(1):52–62. doi:10.61969/jai.1337500.
Bannister, Peter. 2024. “English Medium Instruction Educator Language Assessment Literacy and the Test of Generative AI in Online Higher Education.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 15(2):55–72. doi:10.22055/rals.2024.45862.3214.
Cotton, Debby R. E., Peter A. Cotton, and J. Reuben Shipway. 2024. “Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 61(2):228–39. doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
Črček, Nikola, and Jakob Patekar. 2023. “Writing with AI: University Students’ Use of ChatGPT.” Journal of Language and Education 9(4):128–38. doi:10.17323/jle.2023.17379.
Kitchenham, Barbara. 2004. “Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews, Version 1.0.” Empirical Software Engineering 33(2004):1–26.
Levine, Rebecca S., Rebecca J. Lim, and Amy Vatne Bintliff. 2023. “Social and Emotional Learning during Pandemic-Related Remote and Hybrid Instruction: Teacher Strategies in Response to Trauma.” Education Sciences 13(4). doi:10.3390/educsci13040411.
MacDonald, Jackie. 2014. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Vol. 34.
Mokdad, Hasan. 2024. “Ethical Use of Generative AI by Master’s Students at the Lebanese University Faculty of Education Mots-Clés.” 1–22.
Perkins, Mike, Jasper Roe, Darius Postma, James McGaughran, and Don Hickerson. 2024. “Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse.” Journal of Academic Ethics 22(1):89–113. doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6.
Revell, T., W. Yeadon, G. Cahilly-Bretzin, I. Clarke, G. Manning, J. Jones, C. Mulley, R. J. Pascual, N. Bradley, D. Thomas, and F. Leneghan. 2024. “ChatGPT versus Human Essayists: An Exploration of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence for Authorship and Academic Integrity in the Humanities.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 20(1). doi:10.1007/s40979-024-00161-8.
Rudolph, Jürgen, Samson Tan, and Shannon Tan. 2023. “ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6(1):342–63. doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
Shen, Yanan, and Liu Chen. 2025. “‘Critical Chatting’ or ‘Casual Cheating’: How Graduate EFL Students Utilize ChatGPT for Academic Writing.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 0(0):1–29. doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2479141.
Smolansky, Adele, Andrew Cram, Corina Raduescu, Sandris Zeivots, Elaine Huber, and Rene F. Kizilcec. 2023. “Educator and Student Perspectives on the Impact of Generative AI on Assessments in Higher Education.” L@S 2023 - Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (December):378–82. doi:10.1145/3573051.3596191.
Sousa, Ana Elisa, and Paula Cardoso. 2025. “Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students.” Electronics (Switzerland) 14(7):1–20. doi:10.3390/electronics14071258.
Sun, Rongjian, Minmin Tang, Junjun Zhou, Nguyen Thi Thuy Loan, and Cheng Yen Wang. 2025. “The Dark Tetrad as Associated Factors in Generative AI Academic Misconduct: Insights beyond Personal Attribute Variables.” Frontiers in Education 10(July):1–7. doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1551721.
Thomas, James, and Angela Harden. 2008. “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8:1–10. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information: Towar a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27(3):425–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540.
Wang, Changzhao, Stephen J. Aguilar, Jennifer S. Bankard, Eric Bui, and Benjamin Nye. 2024. “Writing with AI: What College Students Learned from Utilizing ChatGPT for a Writing Assignment.” Education Sciences 14(9). doi:10.3390/educsci14090976.
Wang, Lixun, and Boyuan Ren. 2024. “Enhancing Academic Writing in a Linguistics Course with Generative AI: An Empirical Study in a Higher Education Institution in Hong Kong.” Education Sciences 14(12). doi:10.3390/educsci14121329.
Zhao, Xin, Andrew Cox, and Xuanning Chen. 2025. “The Use of Generative AI by Students with Disabilities in Higher Education.” Internet and Higher Education 66(March):101014. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
