ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK: AN ADVENTIST PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Carmen Mandey Universitas Klabat
  • Douglas Sepang Universitas Klabat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.45049

Keywords:

ethical decision-making, Adventist perspective, deontology, utilitarianism, religiosity, Biblical principles

Abstract

This study explores ethical decision-making (EDM) from an Adventist perspective by proposing a framework grounded in Biblical principles and the writings of Ellen G. White. Ethical decision-making has been widely discussed across various disciplines, particularly through philosophical approaches such as deontology and utilitarianism, which respectively emphasize actions and consequences. However, limited research has focused on a religion-based EDM model, especially within the Seventh-day Adventist context. Using a descriptive analysis method, this study reviews relevant literature on existing EDM models, philosophical theories, and the role of religiosity in influencing ethical behavior. The findings indicate that personal values and religious commitment significantly shape decision-making processes. Based on this foundation, the study proposes a four-step Adventist EDM framework: (1) growing in the mind and character of Christ, (2) honoring God by doing what is right, (3) seeking God’s guidance through prayer and Scripture, and (4) making decisions based on God’s will rather than fear of consequences. This proposed model emphasizes a personal relationship with God as the core of ethical decision-making and highlights faith, obedience, and spiritual growth as essential elements. The study contributes to the existing literature by offering a faith-based perspective on EDM and provides practical guidance for individuals, particularly Seventh-day Adventists, in addressing ethical dilemmas in daily life and the workplace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anselmo, F. V. (2009). Intuition, prayer, and managerial decision-making processes: A religion-based framework. Management Decision, 47(6), 930-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740910966668

Arjoon, S. (2007). Ethical decision-making: A case for the triple font theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(4), 395–410.

Barnett, J. & Karson, M. (1987). Personal values and business decisions: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5): 371-383.

Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.

Biedron, R. (2020, Nov. 25). Ethical decision making framework for leaders: Finding the best solutions to thorny problems. Planergy. https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions.

Bonde, S. & Firenze, P. (2011, spring semester). Framework for thinking ethically [Dialogue and Debate in a seminar]. Making choices: Ethical decision at the frontier of global science, Brown University, RI, United States).

Bonde, S., Firenze, P., Green, J., Grinberg, M., Korijn, J., Levoy, E., ... & Weisberg, L. (2013). A framework for making ethical decisions. Brown University (STS). https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions.

Bowen, S. A. (2005). A practical model for ethical decision making in issues management and public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 191-216.

Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of business ethics, 15(9), 927-940

Chan, C., & Ananthram, S. (2019). Religion-based decision making in Indian multinationals: A multi-faith study of ethical virtues and mindsets. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 651-677.

Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 216.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-14