MEMBANGUN IMAJINASI ANAK SD MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN SENI RUPA BERBASIS TEORI BELAJAR KONSTRUKTIVISME DAN HUMANISME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.45078Keywords:
Imagination, constructivism, humanism, art education, elementary schoolAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of constructivism and humanism learning theories in building elementary students’ imagination through art education. The problem addressed in this study is that art learning in elementary schools is often teacher-centered and limits students’ opportunities to explore their imagination and creativity. This research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by examining relevant books, scientific journals, and previous research findings. The results show that constructivism supports the development of imagination through active learning, exploration, and experience-based creative processes. Meanwhile, humanism emphasizes the importance of self-expression, emotional development, and personal freedom, which significantly contribute to students’ imaginative growth. The integration of these two theories creates a student-centered learning environment that encourages creativity, engagement, and meaningful learning experiences. Therefore, the implementation of constructivism and humanism is highly relevant in enhancing students’ imagination and improving the quality of art education in elementary schools.
Downloads
References
Alter, F., Hays, T., & O’Hara, R. (2009). Creative arts teaching and practice: Critical reflections of primary school teachers in Australia. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(9), 1–22.
Bamford, A. (2006). The wow factor: Global research compendium on the impact of the arts in education. Waxmann.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD.
Burnard, P. (2006). Reflecting on the creativity agenda in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 313–318.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600865814
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.
https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Freiberg, H. J., & Lamb, S. M. (2009). Dimensions of person-centered classroom management. Theory Into Practice, 48(2), 99–105.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840902776228
Garvis, S., & Pendergast, D. (2011). An investigation of early childhood teacher self-efficacy beliefs in the teaching of arts education. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12(9), 1–16.
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. Teachers College Press.
Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists... in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Routledge.
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 20–47. Cambridge University Press.
Markham, T. (2011). Project-based learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38–42.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Charles Merrill.
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education. OECD Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
