ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL MULTIPLE CHOICE MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MATERI MENGHITUNG BANGUN DATAR UNTUK KELAS 3 SD NEGERI INPRES KOTABARU DI NABIRE

Authors

  • Yonece Delila Mara Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Marzel Joska Hitipeuw Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Alfrida Balisa Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Wawan Gunawan Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.45179

Keywords:

item analysis, multiple-choice questions, validity, reliability, difficulty index, discriminatory power

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of quality evaluation instruments in elementary school mathematics learning, particularly in calculating plane figures, which demands conceptual accuracy and students' numeracy skills. Instruments that do not meet quality standards have the potential to produce inaccurate measurements, impacting learning decisions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of multiple-choice test items based on validity, reliability, difficulty index, and discriminatory power in third-grade elementary school students. The method used was a quantitative descriptive approach, with third-grade students at SD Negeri Inpres Kotabaru in Nabire as the subjects. Data collection was conducted using an objective multiple-choice test with five answer options. Data analysis used the Pearson Product Moment test for validity, the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient for reliability, and analysis of the difficulty index and discriminatory power to assess item quality. The results showed that all test items were valid because their calculated r values ​​were greater than the table r and significance below 0.05. The instrument also had very high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.946, indicating strong internal consistency. The difficulty index analysis showed that the majority of questions fell into the moderate category, with a distribution between easy and very easy, supporting diverse student ability levels. The discriminatory power analysis showed that the majority of questions fell into the good and excellent categories, effectively discriminating student abilities. These findings contribute to the development of high-quality, empirically analyzed evaluation instruments in elementary school mathematics learning. The study's conclusions confirm that the developed instrument meets high-quality standards and is suitable for use as a learning evaluation tool. Implications of this study include strengthening data-driven evaluation practices, increasing the accuracy of learning outcome assessments, and developing more systematic instruments. Further research recommendations focus on broader instrument testing and the development of technology-based evaluation models to enhance learning effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardiansyah, R., Putra, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi berbasis multiple choice pada pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v12i2.5678

Arifin, Z., Handayani, T., & Puspitasari, R. (2024). Analisis kualitas butir soal dalam evaluasi pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v10i1.4321

Azizah, N., Maulana, F., & Putri, A. (2025). Daya pembeda soal dalam mengukur kemampuan siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v14i1.7890

Dewi, L., Kurniawan, A., & Yuliana, S. (2024). Analisis reliabilitas instrumen tes menggunakan Cronbach’s Alpha. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i2.3456

Fadillah, M., Nugroho, H., & Sari, R. (2024). Konsistensi internal instrumen evaluasi dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v9i1.2233

Firmansyah, D., Utami, R., & Santoso, B. (2024). Analisis daya pembeda dalam evaluasi hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i2.5566

Hanan, A., Kusumayanti, E., & Jannah, M. (2024). Pengembangan tes objektif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 13(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpdi.v13i1.7788

Handayani, T., Prasetyo, B., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v11i1.8899

Hapsari, D., Pratiwi, N., & Wulandari, S. (2025). Analisis tingkat kesukaran soal dalam pembelajaran matematika dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 14(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v14i2.9988

Hidayat, A., Prasetyo, E., & Rahmawati, S. (2025). Validitas instrumen dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 7(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmp.v7i1.6677

Hidayatunnisa’i, F., Nur Cahyo, A., & Prawiki, M. (2024). Peran evaluasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v10i2.1122

Inawati, S., Verawati, L., & Putri Andini, R. (2024). Interaksi guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v12i1.1010

Ismiyati, R., Rahayu, D., & Sari, N. (2024). Analisis indeks kesukaran butir soal matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v9i2.2020

Jumini, S., Marambaawang, E., & Riau, F. (2024). Pengukuran tingkat kesukaran soal dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v13i2.3030

Kurniawan, A., Rahmawati, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen tes berbasis indikator pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v10i1.4040

Kusumayanti, E., & Jannah, M. (2025). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika menggunakan tes tertulis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 14(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpdi.v14i1.5050

Lestari, S., Putra, D., & Wibowo, A. (2025). Pengembangan soal multiple choice pada materi bangun datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v12i1.6060

Mira, A., Sari, R., & Sari, N. (2024). Analisis butir soal sebagai evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v10i2.7070

Nugroho, H., Sari, R., & Fadillah, M. (2025). Uji reliabilitas instrumen pendidikan menggunakan pendekatan statistik. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 9(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v9i1.8080

Pradani, R., & Efendi, A. (2024). Kompetensi pedagogik guru dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 8(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpg.v8i1.9090

Prasetya, B., Wibowo, A., & Sugiyono. (2025). Metode deskriptif kuantitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 8(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmp.v8i2.1111

Prasetyo, B., Handayani, T., & Putra, D. (2024). Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v10i2.1212

Putra, D., Lestari, S., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Uji validitas instrumen menggunakan Pearson Product Moment. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i1.1313

Putri, A., Maulana, F., & Azizah, N. (2024). Evaluasi daya pembeda soal pada pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v13i1.1414

Rahmawati, D., Hidayat, A., & Prasetyo, B. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi berbasis indikator pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1234/jp.v9i2.1515

Rismaulhijjah, N., & Kuswanti, E. (2024). Penggunaan tes objektif dalam evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v11i2.1616

Santoso, B., Firmansyah, D., & Utami, R. (2024). Analisis daya pembeda soal dalam evaluasi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v10i2.1717

Sari, R. (2024). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan kualitas soal. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v9i2.1818

Sari, R., Nugroho, H., & Fadillah, M. (2024). Uji reliabilitas instrumen pendidikan. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i1.1919

Sugiyono. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryana, A., Rahmawati, D., & Pradani, R. (2024). Kompetensi guru dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 9(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpg.v9i1.2020

Utami, R., Santoso, B., & Firmansyah, D. (2025). Analisis daya pembeda dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v12i2.2121

Wibowo, A., Putra, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Analisis instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i2.2222

Wulandari, S., Pratiwi, N., & Hapsari, D. (2024). Analisis tingkat kesukaran soal matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 13(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v13i2.2323

Yuliana, S., Kurniawan, A., & Dewi, L. (2024). Reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i2.2424

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19