ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL MULTIPLE CHOICE MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MATERI MENGHITUNG BANGUN DATAR UNTUK KELAS 3 SD NEGERI INPRES KOTABARU DI NABIRE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.45179Keywords:
item analysis, multiple-choice questions, validity, reliability, difficulty index, discriminatory powerAbstract
This research is motivated by the importance of quality evaluation instruments in elementary school mathematics learning, particularly in calculating plane figures, which demands conceptual accuracy and students' numeracy skills. Instruments that do not meet quality standards have the potential to produce inaccurate measurements, impacting learning decisions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of multiple-choice test items based on validity, reliability, difficulty index, and discriminatory power in third-grade elementary school students. The method used was a quantitative descriptive approach, with third-grade students at SD Negeri Inpres Kotabaru in Nabire as the subjects. Data collection was conducted using an objective multiple-choice test with five answer options. Data analysis used the Pearson Product Moment test for validity, the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient for reliability, and analysis of the difficulty index and discriminatory power to assess item quality. The results showed that all test items were valid because their calculated r values were greater than the table r and significance below 0.05. The instrument also had very high reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.946, indicating strong internal consistency. The difficulty index analysis showed that the majority of questions fell into the moderate category, with a distribution between easy and very easy, supporting diverse student ability levels. The discriminatory power analysis showed that the majority of questions fell into the good and excellent categories, effectively discriminating student abilities. These findings contribute to the development of high-quality, empirically analyzed evaluation instruments in elementary school mathematics learning. The study's conclusions confirm that the developed instrument meets high-quality standards and is suitable for use as a learning evaluation tool. Implications of this study include strengthening data-driven evaluation practices, increasing the accuracy of learning outcome assessments, and developing more systematic instruments. Further research recommendations focus on broader instrument testing and the development of technology-based evaluation models to enhance learning effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Ardiansyah, R., Putra, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi berbasis multiple choice pada pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v12i2.5678
Arifin, Z., Handayani, T., & Puspitasari, R. (2024). Analisis kualitas butir soal dalam evaluasi pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v10i1.4321
Azizah, N., Maulana, F., & Putri, A. (2025). Daya pembeda soal dalam mengukur kemampuan siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v14i1.7890
Dewi, L., Kurniawan, A., & Yuliana, S. (2024). Analisis reliabilitas instrumen tes menggunakan Cronbach’s Alpha. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i2.3456
Fadillah, M., Nugroho, H., & Sari, R. (2024). Konsistensi internal instrumen evaluasi dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v9i1.2233
Firmansyah, D., Utami, R., & Santoso, B. (2024). Analisis daya pembeda dalam evaluasi hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i2.5566
Hanan, A., Kusumayanti, E., & Jannah, M. (2024). Pengembangan tes objektif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 13(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpdi.v13i1.7788
Handayani, T., Prasetyo, B., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v11i1.8899
Hapsari, D., Pratiwi, N., & Wulandari, S. (2025). Analisis tingkat kesukaran soal dalam pembelajaran matematika dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 14(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v14i2.9988
Hidayat, A., Prasetyo, E., & Rahmawati, S. (2025). Validitas instrumen dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 7(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmp.v7i1.6677
Hidayatunnisa’i, F., Nur Cahyo, A., & Prawiki, M. (2024). Peran evaluasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v10i2.1122
Inawati, S., Verawati, L., & Putri Andini, R. (2024). Interaksi guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v12i1.1010
Ismiyati, R., Rahayu, D., & Sari, N. (2024). Analisis indeks kesukaran butir soal matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v9i2.2020
Jumini, S., Marambaawang, E., & Riau, F. (2024). Pengukuran tingkat kesukaran soal dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v13i2.3030
Kurniawan, A., Rahmawati, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen tes berbasis indikator pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v10i1.4040
Kusumayanti, E., & Jannah, M. (2025). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika menggunakan tes tertulis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 14(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpdi.v14i1.5050
Lestari, S., Putra, D., & Wibowo, A. (2025). Pengembangan soal multiple choice pada materi bangun datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v12i1.6060
Mira, A., Sari, R., & Sari, N. (2024). Analisis butir soal sebagai evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v10i2.7070
Nugroho, H., Sari, R., & Fadillah, M. (2025). Uji reliabilitas instrumen pendidikan menggunakan pendekatan statistik. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 9(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v9i1.8080
Pradani, R., & Efendi, A. (2024). Kompetensi pedagogik guru dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 8(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpg.v8i1.9090
Prasetya, B., Wibowo, A., & Sugiyono. (2025). Metode deskriptif kuantitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 8(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1234/jmp.v8i2.1111
Prasetyo, B., Handayani, T., & Putra, D. (2024). Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1234/jep.v10i2.1212
Putra, D., Lestari, S., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Uji validitas instrumen menggunakan Pearson Product Moment. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i1.1313
Putri, A., Maulana, F., & Azizah, N. (2024). Evaluasi daya pembeda soal pada pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpp.v13i1.1414
Rahmawati, D., Hidayat, A., & Prasetyo, B. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi berbasis indikator pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1234/jp.v9i2.1515
Rismaulhijjah, N., & Kuswanti, E. (2024). Penggunaan tes objektif dalam evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v11i2.1616
Santoso, B., Firmansyah, D., & Utami, R. (2024). Analisis daya pembeda soal dalam evaluasi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v10i2.1717
Sari, R. (2024). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan kualitas soal. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1234/jip.v9i2.1818
Sari, R., Nugroho, H., & Fadillah, M. (2024). Uji reliabilitas instrumen pendidikan. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i1.1919
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryana, A., Rahmawati, D., & Pradani, R. (2024). Kompetensi guru dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 9(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpg.v9i1.2020
Utami, R., Santoso, B., & Firmansyah, D. (2025). Analisis daya pembeda dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v12i2.2121
Wibowo, A., Putra, D., & Lestari, S. (2024). Analisis instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v11i2.2222
Wulandari, S., Pratiwi, N., & Hapsari, D. (2024). Analisis tingkat kesukaran soal matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 13(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpd.v13i2.2323
Yuliana, S., Kurniawan, A., & Dewi, L. (2024). Reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Statistik Pendidikan, 8(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsp.v8i2.2424
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.