PERSEPSI MAHASISWA GENERASI Z TERHADAP KARAKTERISTIK DOSEN IDEAL DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP IKLIM PEMBELAJARAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI PADA ERA DIGITAL

Authors

  • Umi Fajar Azizah Azizah Universitas Tiga Serangkai
  • Su'ad Jauharoh Universitas Tiga Serangkai
  • Lailati Rohmah Universitas Tiga Serangkai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.46641

Keywords:

Generation Z, Ideal Lecturer Characteristics, Learning Climate, Higher Education, Digital Era

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Generation Z students regarding the characteristics of an ideal lecturer and their implications for the learning climate in higher education in the digital era. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 23 undergraduate students from the Psychology Study Program at Universitas Tiga Serangkai, selected using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal three main themes: (1) ideal lecturer characteristics, including strong interpersonal communication skills, openness to discussion, empathy, clarity in explaining material, and the ability to facilitate interactive learning; (2) meaningful learning methods, where students preferred active, contextual, and experience based approaches such as case discussions, collaborative projects, and the use of digital media; and (3) a supportive learning climate, characterized by psychological safety, positive lecturer-student interactions, and active student participation. These findings are discussed within the framework of Self Determination Theory, which emphasizes the fulfillment of students' basic psychological needs autonomy, competence, and relatedness as key drivers of intrinsic motivation and engagement. The study concludes that lecturers who build positive interpersonal relationships and provide participatory spaces tend to create more conducive and meaningful learning environments for Generation Z students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, A., Arianto, A., & Mau, M. (2023). Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Dosen dan Mahasiswa terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(12), 10508–10514. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i12.3481

Anggara, I. Z., Martono, S., & Puspitasari, A. R. (2024). Persepsi Iklim Kenyamanan dan Keamanan Belajar pada Mahasiswa. EDUCATION: Scientific Journal of Education, 2(1), 23–37.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). (2024). Survei Penetrasi dan Perilaku Internet 2024. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik RI. https://www.bps.go.id/

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.ppj.39.8

Cilliers, E. J. (2017). the Challenge of Teaching Generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design : Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Edisi Ketiga. Pustaka Belajar.

Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (2012). Second International Handbook of Science Education. In Second International Handbook of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7

Gebremeskel, A. A., Ayele, M. A., & Wondimuneh, T. E. (2025). Student engagement, conceptual-understanding, and problem-solving ability in learning plane geometry through an integrated instructional approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16391

Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613

Khuhro, N. (2024). Study of Classroom Climate, Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy and Learning Experiences An Analyses Employing Social Cognitive Theory. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i1.722

Liza, S., Selian, N., Muhammadiyah, J., 91, N., Lueng Bata, K., & Aceh, K. B. (2025). Studi Kualitatif tentang Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Gaya Mengajar Dosen dan Dampaknya terhadap Motivasi Belajar. 3(6), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v3i6.1571

Ma, W., Yang, W., & Bu, Q. (2024). Interconnected factors in EFL engagement: classroom climate, growth mindset, and achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(October), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353360

Normasari, M., Adin, A. A., & Rizkiyana, R. (2025). Hubungan antara Iklim Kampus dengan Student Engagement pada Mahasiswa Karyawan Fakultas Psikologi Universitas X. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Kesehatan dan Keperawatan, 2(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasikk.v2i1.71

Oktaviani, A., Imamah, Y. H., & Iqbal, R. (2025). Analisis Strategi Dosen dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran Kitab Silsilatu Ta’lim Al-Lughah Al-Arabiyah Maddatu At-Tafsir Di Ma’had Sa’ad Bin Abi Waqqash UMP. Unisan Jurnal: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 04(09), 229–239.

Prananto, K., Cahyadi, S., Lubis, F. Y., & Hinduan, Z. R. (2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students – a systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w

Pratama, A. R. (2024). The Influence of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Understanding of Accounting Concepts. Journal of Education Innovation and Curriculum Development, 2(1), 18–24.

Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: What It Is, How to Do It. Building Autonomous Learners, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sakdiah, E., Harahap, S. A., Aini, A., Mubarok, N. Z., Fairuza, K., & Albie, A. S. U. (2025). Hubungan Komunikasi Antrapribadi antara Mahasiswa dan Dosen dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar di Lingkungan Fakultas Dakwah dan KOmunikasi UINSU. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 8(1), 1439–1443.

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2018). Generation Z A Century in the Making. Routledge.

Tandilimbong, H., Dwi Wahyuni Ambali, D., & Rante, F. (2024). Hubungan Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Mahasiswa Dan Dosen Dengan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Program Studi S1 Keperawatan Semester Iv Institut Toraja Raya Indonesia Tahun 2024. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Promotif, 8(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.56437/jikp.v8i2.174

Tran, C. A., Van, H. T., Nguyen, H. T. T., Le, P. B., & Tran, T. (2025). Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in higher education through AI-supported flipped classrooms: A mixed-methods study. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(8), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i8.9489

Widyaningrum, R., Rahmayanti;, Sudaryanto;, & Bakti, S. M. (2024). PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR PADA PROGRAM STUDI SARJANA KEDOKTERAN FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN SWASTA DI SEMARANG. Ibnu Sina: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan-Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, 23(2), 287–297.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28