AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH TEACHER CODE SWITCHING AND CODE MIXING TO ENCOURAGE STUDENT ENGLISH LEARNING PARTICIPATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61310Keywords:
code switching; code mixing; teacher talk; student participation; EFL classroomAbstract
This study aims to analyze the use of teacher code switching and code mixing in English classroom interaction and their role in encouraging student participation during the learning process. The research was conducted in Grade X AP 2 at SMK Mutiara Terpadu Palabuhanratu using a qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach. The participants consisted of one English teacher and the students of the selected class, five of whom were interviewed in depth. Data were collected through classroom observation, semi-structured interviews with the teacher and students, documentation, and transcription of classroom interaction, and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that the teacher employed three types of code switching—inter-sentential switching (119 utterances), intra-sentential switching (51 utterances), and extra-sentential switching (2 utterances)—as well as two types of code mixing, namely alternation (119 utterances) and insertion (53 utterances). These strategies were applied to explain learning materials, give instructions, overcome students’ language barriers, adapt language use to students’ proficiency levels, and maintain smooth classroom interaction. The results further reveal that teacher code switching and code mixing helped create learning conditions in which students could understand the material more easily, participate in discussions, answer and ask questions, follow instructions, and interact more confidently. Thus, teacher code switching and code mixing function as pedagogical communication strategies that support classroom interaction and encourage student participation in EFL learning.
Downloads
References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen Irvine, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en espanol: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7-8), 581-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581
Sert, O. (2005). The functions of code switching in ELT classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 11(8).
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.