PENERAPAN E-MODUL LARUTAN PENYANGGA BERBASIS PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TERINTEGRASI TEACHING AT THE RIGHT LEVEL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MURID FASE F DI SMAN 9 PADANG

Authors

  • Fatimah Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Iryani Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61326

Keywords:

E-Module, Buffer Solution, Problem-Based Learning, Teaching at the Right Level, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Buffer solutions are one of the more abstract and complex topics in chemistry because they involve the interplay of macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations, and require the ability to analyze and calculate pH. Based on interviews with chemistry teachers at SMAN 9 Padang, it was found that in the 2024/2025 academic year, 45% of 11th-grade students had not met the Learning Objective Achievement Criteria (KKTP) for the topic of buffer solutions. One effort to address this issue is the implementation of a Problem-Based Learning (PBL)-based e-module on buffer solutions integrated with Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL). This study aims to analyze the effect of implementing a PBL-based e-module on buffer solutions integrated with TaRL on the cognitive learning outcomes of Phase F students at SMAN 9 Padang. This study employed a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design. The research sample consisted of Class XI Moving Chemistry 4 as the experimental class and Class XI Moving Chemistry 5 as the control class, both selected using purposive sampling. The research instrument consisted of a 15-item multiple-choice objective test administered before (pretest) and after (posttest) instruction. The results showed that the average posttest score for the experimental class (80.44) was higher than that of the control class (67.56). The average N-gain score for the experimental class was 0.744, which falls into the high category, while that of the control class was 0.568, which falls into the moderate category. The independent samples t-test yielded a t-value of 4.53. Thus, the PBL-based buffer solution e-module integrated with TaRL can improve students’ cognitive learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abshari, A. A., & Guspatni. (2024). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Terintegrasi Markerless Augmented Reality pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Fase F Kimia SMA / MA. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 44743–44749. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/21185

Akbarianto, I. F., & Iryani. (2024). Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Modul Larutan Penyangga Berbasis Masalah terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Entalpi Pendidikan Kimia, 1–9.

Ananda, D., & Adi, P. (2024). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dengan Pendekatan Teaching At The Right Level Dalam Pembelajaran Memaknai Informasi Teks Berita Kelas VII SMPN 2 Pakis. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v4.i2.2024.8

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Banerjee, A. V, Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., & Walton, M. (2021). From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.73

Damayanti, F. D., Wardani, O. P., Islam, U., & Agung, S. (2025). Penerapan Teaching At The Right Level ( Tarl ) Untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas XI K SMAN 6 Semarang Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa. Tunas Pendidikan, 8(1), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.52060/pgsd.v8i1.2956

Fauziah, I., & Iryani. (2025). Efektivitas E-Modul Larutan Penyangga Berbasis Problem Based Learning Terintegrasi Teaching At The Right Level Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Fase F SMA. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(3), 1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i3.6551

Febriani, H. A., & Kustiono. (2022). The Effectiveness of Interactive e-Module for Natural Science subject at Equality Education Program. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 10(2), 101–109. 10.15294/ijcets.v10i2.59892

Hasibuan, A., & Sulasmi, E. (2026). Problem Based Learning dalam Kurikulum untuk Mengasah keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Ilmiah Aquinas, 9(1), 45–52. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/Aquinas/article/view/6069

Mahendra, M. R., Enawaty, E., Junanto, T., Muharini, R., & Lestari, I. (2023). Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Modul Kimia Dasar Berbasis Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Mahasiswa pada Materi Termokimia. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 15(2), 120–127. https:/doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v15i2.27826

Nikmah, Z. L., Patonah, S., & Kusniati, S. (2025). Pengaruh Teaching At The Right Level ( Tarl ) Dalam Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas 3C Pelajaran Matematika SDN Karanganyar Gunung 02. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dasar (JIPDAS), 5(2), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.37081/jipdas.v5i2.2733

Putri, S. N. A., & Ritonga, P. S. (2026). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas Xi Pada Materi Larutan Buffer Menggunakan Instrument Test Diagnostic Four-Tier. Journal Of Chemistry Education And Integration, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24014/jcei.v5i1.38290

Rahma, S., Erika, F., & Lestari, S. (2025). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Melalui Tes Diagnostik CRI : Studi Kasus di SMAN 2 Muara Badak. CHEDS: Journal of Chemistry, Education, and Science, 9(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.30743/cheds.v9i2.11373

Rahmawati, A., Fitriani, A. R., & Lathifa, U. (2022). Phenomenology of Conceptual Understanding Ability , Representation , and Student Algorithm on Stoichiometry Materials. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2022.4.1.9744

Sari, M. O. S. K., & Harjono. (2024). Pbl-tarl-crt: integrating innovative approaches to improve science learning outcomes in grade 8. BIOMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.26877/bioma.v13i1.693

Sholikhah, L. N. A., & Priyasmika, R. (2025). Analysis of Students ’ Misconception of Grade XI on Buffer Solution Material Using Three-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Instrument. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v14i1.13706

Subiyantoro, S. (2025). Buku Problem and Project-Based Learning. Penerbit Lakeisha.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriyani, N. K. R., & Winangun, I. M. A. (2024). Strategi meningkatkan pemahaman peserta didik melalui pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan, Agama Dan Budaya, 8(2), 199–207. https://journal.mpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/widyacarya/article/view/358

Susanti, N. E., Wahyu, I., Utami, P., & Trisanti, D. Y. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Scaffolding Pada Zone Of Proximal Development ( ZPD ) Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka ( IKM ) DI SMKN 10 Malang. Jurnal MIPA Dan Pembelajarannya, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v4i52024p2

Widodo, B. S. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan. UNESA Press.

Wijaya, Y. S., & Iryani, I. (2021). Validitas E-Modul Larutan Penyangga Berbasis Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) Terintegrasi Teaching at the Right Level ( TaRL ). Entalpi Pendidikan Kimia, 10–17.

Wulandari, F., Yogica, R., Darussyamsu, R., Padang, N., & Info, A. (2021). Analisis Manfaat Penggunaan E-Modul Jauh Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Khazanah Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 15(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v15i2.10809

Yunus, M. (2025). Analisis Tren Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Ilmiah Dalam Pendidikan Kimia : Studi Bibliometrik. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 6(4), 5384–5396. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i4.3459

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24