PENGARUH SUPERVISI KEPALA SEKOLAH DAN PENGUASAAN TEKNOLOGI GURU TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI DI KECAMATAN GUNUNG AGUNG

Authors

  • Veronica Lisa Febriani Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
  • Siti Nurlaila Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
  • Muhfahroyin Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i3.65541

Keywords:

principal supervision, students' learning outcomes, teachers' technological mastery

Abstract

Students' learning outcomes are one of the indicators of successful learning processes. A preliminary survey at Public Elementary Schools in Gunung Agung District revealed that 53.52% of students had not achieved the KKTP. This study aimed to determine the effect of principal supervision (X1) and teachers' technological mastery (X2) on students' learning outcomes (Y) using a quantitative ex post facto design with 48 teachers from five schools. Data were collected through questionnaires and documentation, analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS. Findings showed principal supervision had a significant effect (t = 3.332; Sig. = 0.002 < 0.05). Teachers' technological mastery also had a significant effect (t = 6.463; Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). Simultaneously, both variables had a significant effect (F = 162.504 > F-table = 3.20; Sig. = 0.000). R-squared = 0.878 indicated that 87.8% of the variance was explained by the two variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basri, A., dkk. (2025). Pengaruh supervisi akademik kepala sekolah terhadap kualitas pembelajaran.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2022). SuperVision and instructional leadership:

Iskanto, I., dkk. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogi dan penguasaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi terhadap hasil belajar pada Kurikulum Merdeka.

Judijanto. (2024). Literasi digital guru dan kualitas pembelajaran di era digital.

Keengwe, J. (Ed.). (2013). Research perspectives and best practices in educational technology integration. IGI Global.

Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2021). Educational administration: Concepts and practices

McEwan-Adkins, E. K. (2002). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership

Mediatati, N., & Jati, T. (2022). Pengaruh supervisi kepala sekolah terhadap kualitas pembelajaran dan hasil belajar peserta didik.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.

Ratnawati, R., Choiriyah, F., Darto, M. N., Ghofur, A., Rahman, A. A. S., Purwoko, L. F., Purnomo, A., Suarti, Q. F. H., Majid, A., & Prasetyo, G. T. (2025). SUPERDAYA: Mengembangkan teori dan praktik supervisi pendidikan untuk pemberdayaan.

Riduwan. (2022). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alfabeta.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). Supervision: A

Soraya, R., Lian, B., & Putra, A. (2026). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogi guru dan pemanfaatan teknologi terhadap hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar.

Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques

Syafitri, D., & Novriadi. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penguasaan teknologi guru dalam pembelajaran.

Syarifuddin, & Fitrah. (2025). Hubungan penguasaan teknologi digital guru dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003).

Wulan, & Prayogo. (2023). Pengaruh teknologi digital terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa.

Yamamoto, J., Kush, J. C., Lombard, R., & Hertzog, C. J. (Eds.). (2010).

Sumariyak, A. Karwono, & Muhfahroyin.(2023). Pengaruh Pemberian Insentif Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Smp Se-Kecamatan. Jurnal Lentera Pendidikan Pusat Penelitian LPPM UM METRO, 6(1), 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19