Javanese Taboo Language as Social Interaction among Teenagers from Different Socioeconomic Backgrounds

Authors

  • Fajar Susanto Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Claudia Fira Inne Purwantoro Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Tri Indrayanti Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/wistara.v7i1.48610

Keywords:

family influence, peer influence, socioeconomic background, taboo language, teenagers

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain why teenagers from different socioeconomic backgrounds use the Javanese taboo language and how taboo language influences the teenagers’ social interaction. This study was designed with the ethnographic qualitative approach. Because the subject has been decided in advance, the case study approach was also used in addition to the ethnographic method in this study. The participants in this study were four teenagers, two from the upper-middle class and two from the lower middle class. Data were taken with direct  observations,  recordings,  and  interviews. The findings indicated that a cursing ‘cok’, a sort of Javanese taboo language, is most commonly utilized by teenagers. That taboo language has become a common part of adolescents’ communication, particularly among lower middle-class teenagers. Family environment and peer groups strongly influence the normalization of taboo expressions in everyday speech. Lower middle-class participants tended to use taboo language as a symbol of intimacy, solidarity, and emotional expression, while upper middle-class participants showed greater awareness and control in avoiding taboo expressions due to stricter parental guidance and social norms. The study concludes that taboo language among teenagers is closely connected to socialization, identity, and interactional context rather than simply impolite behavior. Socioeconomic background significantly shapes teenagers’ perceptions, habits, and regulation of taboo language in daily communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akintan, O., Jewitt, S., & Cli, M. (2018). Culture , tradition , and taboo : Understanding the social shaping of fuel choices and cooking practices in Nigeria. Energy Research and Social Science, 40, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.019

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Anggita, F. N. (2015). A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Taboo Words in Bad Teacher Movie. Yogyakarta State University.

Basrowi. (2005). Pengantar Sosiologi. Bogor: Ghalia Yudhistira, Indonesia.

Basuki, & Hartati, U. (2017). Wujud Budaya Jawa yang Tercermin dalam Pisuhan. PIBSI XXXIX, November, 460–481.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. In Qualitative Research in Psychology (Issue 3, pp. 77–101). Edward Arnorld Ltd.

Brennen, B. S. (2025). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. In Routledge (Third Edit). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003122388

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design. In Social Research Methodology. SAGE Publications.

Culpeper, J. (2019). Taboo Language and Impoliteness. In K. Allan (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language (pp. 28–40). Oxford University Press.

Dynel, M. (2012). Swearing Methodologically: the (Im)politeness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on Youtube. Journal of English Studies, 10, 25–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179

Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & O’Brien, C. (2006). Straight from the Source: What Works for First-Generation College Students.

Guillot, M.-N. (2023). Doing swearing across languages e The curious case of. Journal of Pragmatics, 215, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.07.003

Holmes, J. (2005). Politeness Strategies as Linguistic Variables. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 684–697). https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01512-1

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th Ed.). Routledge.

Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (6th Ed.). Routledge.

Jay, T. (1999). Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-social Theory of Speech. John Benjamins B.V.

Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative Research in Sociology: An Introduction (First Edit). SAGE Publications.

Ningjue, Z. (2010). Taboo Language on the Internet: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Using Taboo Language.

Sangasubana, N. (2011). How to Conduct Ethnographic Research. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 567–573.

Shek, D. T. L., Ph, D., Lin, L., & Ph, D. (2017). Use of Foul Language Among Chinese Adolescents : Developmental Change and Relations With Psychosocial Competences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.010

Spradley, J. P. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. Waveland Press, Inc.

Sulpizio, S., Toti, M., Del Maschio, N., Costa, A., Fedeli, D., Job, R., & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Are you really cursing ? Neural processing of taboo words in native and foreign language. Brain and Language, 194, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.05.003

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Susanto, F., Fira Inne Purwantoro, C., & Indrayanti, T. (2026). Javanese Taboo Language as Social Interaction among Teenagers from Different Socioeconomic Backgrounds. Wistara: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23969/wistara.v7i1.48610

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.