EVALUASI PENGGUNAAN DANA BOS BERDASARKAN RENCANA KEGIATAN DAN ANGGARAN SEKOLAH (RKAS) DI SMP NEGERI 6 PEKANBARU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.26597Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating the utilization of School Operational Assistance (BOS) funds at SMP Negeri 6 Pekanbaru, specifically assessing the alignment between the previously prepared School Activity and Budget Plan (RKAS) and actual expenditures. The background of this research stems from the importance of accountability and transparency in school financial management to support the improvement of education quality. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, involving a review of documents such as the RKAS for the last fiscal year, budget realization reports, and meeting minutes related to budget planning and evaluation. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with six key informants: the School Principal, BOS Treasurer, teachers, and school committee representatives, to gain a more in-depth and contextual understanding. Research findings reveal that, in general, BOS fund utilization has followed RKAS guidelines, particularly in supporting learning activities, digital literacy, student potential development, and school facility maintenance. Nevertheless, implementation on the ground still faces several challenges, including discrepancies between initial budget planning and actual realization, suboptimal oversight, delays in fund disbursement, and a fairly complex administrative burden. Despite these challenges, the school demonstrates a commitment to transparent and accountable fund management. Therefore, continuous improvement efforts in planning, implementation, and evaluation are crucial to ensure more effective BOS fund utilization and a positive impact on education quality.Downloads
References
Agustin, M, & Syaodih. (2008). Bimbingan konseling untuk anak usia dini. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Brabender, V., & Fallon, A. (2009). Group development in practice: guidance for clinicians and researchers on stages and dynamics of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Fariq, A. (2011). Perkembangan dunia konseling memasuki era globalisasi. Pedagogi, II(Nov 2011), 255-262.
Hodgson, J., & Weil, J. (2011). Commentary: how individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1-3.
Lyznicki, J. M., Young, D. C., Riggs, J. A., Davis, R. M., & Dickinson, B. D. (2001). Obesity: Assessment and management in primary care. American Family Physician, 63(11), 2185-2196.
Nugroho, A., & Sumarsono, R. (2018). Efektivitas Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 25(1), 1-12.
Rahayu, S., & Suryadi, K. (2019). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana BOS di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 14(2), 150-165.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.