PARADIGMA KESEIMBANGAN ANTARA AKADEMIK DAN KESEJAHTERAAN SISWA: PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDIDIKAN JEPANG, DENMARK, DAN FINLANDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.35604Keywords:
Education System, Student Well-Being, OECD, Japan, Denmark, Finland, Holistic Education.Abstract
This study aims to analyze and compare the paradigm of balance between academic achievement and student well-being within the education systems of three OECD countries Japan, Denmark, and Finland. The primary objective is to explore how these nations interpret and implement the concept of equilibrium between academic demands and students’ emotional needs, as well as how their educational policies shape learners’ character and intrinsic motivation. The background of this study arises from the global disparity in educational orientations that often emphasize academic performance and testing outcomes while neglecting students’ psychological welfare, happiness, and holistic development. In many countries, excessive academic pressure has led to negative consequences such as stress, depression, and loss of learning motivation. Conversely, nations like Denmark and Finland demonstrate that prioritizing student well-being can foster meaningful and sustainable learning quality. This research adopts a qualitative approach using the library research method. Data were collected from national education policies, OECD reports, scientific publications, and previous studies. The data were analyzed through Comparative Qualitative Analysis (CQA) to identify similarities, differences, and underlying philosophical values in the educational paradigms of the three countries. The findings reveal that Japan emphasizes work ethics, discipline, and collective responsibility; Denmark prioritizes psychological welfare and learning autonomy; while Finland successfully integrates both through flexible curricula, non-competitive assessment systems, and high teacher professionalism. The implications of this study highlight the necessity for educational reform that balances academic demands with student well-being. The results conclude that an ideal educational paradigm should cultivate the development of whole individuals intellectually competent, emotionally fulfilled, and morally grounded.
Downloads
References
Ahkam, M. S. (2020). Kesejahteraan di sekolah bagi siswa SMA: Konsep dan faktor yang berpengaruh. Jurnal Psikologi TALENTA, 5(2), 143-151.
Alwi, M. &. (2024). School well being di Indonesia: Telaah literatur. Jurnal Talenta Mahasiswa, 1(3), 222-228.
Denmark. (2025). Folkeskole: The Danish Basic School System. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education.
Ewin Sanjaya, Gajah, M. P., & Tim. (2024). Membangun Pendidikan Berkualitas: Kebijakan dan Inovasi dalam Konteks Pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Litnus.
Halim, A., & Hamalik, O. (2021). Media pembelajaran dan proses pembelajaran efektif, Jakarta: PT. Grasindo
Kariya, T. (2023). Education Reform and Social Class in Japan: The Emerging Incentive Divide. Routledge.
Mihajlovic, C. (2023). Learning from Finland: Guidelines for the Development of Inclusive Schools. Springer VS.
Mubarak, F. &. (2024). Pentingnya kesejahteraan emosional di dunia pendidikan. Jurnal Bima: Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 3(3)
Nasution. (2022). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu. Jakarta: Ghalia Indah.
Novendra, A., & Gusmalia. (2024). Pengantar Pendidikan. Padang: CV Pustaka Inspirasi Minang.
OECD. (2024). Education Policy in Japan: Building Bridges towards 2030 – Reviews of National Policies for Education. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2025). Education Policy Outlook 2019: Coverage by topics, education systems and previous OECD country based work. OECD Publishing.
Okano, K. H. (2021). Education and Social Justice in Japan. Routledge.
O. Hamalik, (2023). Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Shoffa, M. S. F. (2023). Manajemen Pendidikan: Strategi Efektif untuk Meningkatkan Sistem Pendidikan. Medan: PT Media Penerbit Indonesia.
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2025). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabet.
Sunarto, R. d. (2022). Pengantar Statistika: Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyadi. (2021). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: NEM.
Surveys, O. E. (2025). Finland 2025: Enriching human capital with more foreign talent. OECD Publishing.
Simola, H. (2025). The Finnish Education Mystery: Historical and Sociological Essays on
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
















