VALUASI SISTEM PENERIMAAN MURID BARU (SPMB) TAHUN 2025 DI SMP NEGERI 3 RAMBIPUJI: MODEL EVALUASI CIPPO STUFFLEBEAM D.L.

Authors

  • Slamet Riyadi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Mufarrihul Hazin Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i4.38370

Keywords:

evaluation of education policy, Cippo model, zoning policy, equal access to education, SPMB 2025

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the 2025 New Student Admission System (Sistem Penerimaan Murid Baru, SPMB) at SMP Negeri 3 Rambipuji, Jember Regency, using the CIPPO evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product, Outcome) developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam. The model was employed to assess the effectiveness, transparency, and impact of the zoning policy on the equity of educational access in rural areas. This research adopts a descriptive-evaluative approach with data collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document studies, involving the school principal, SPMB committee members, teachers, administrative staff, and parents as key informants. The data were analyzed interactively and thematically, following the stages proposed by Miles et al. (2014). The findings indicate that the implementation of SPMB 2025 has been effective, adaptive, and transparent. From the context aspect, the zoning policy aligns with the social and geographical characteristics of rural communities. From the input aspect, the school’s resources were sufficient, although some administrative and technical challenges remain. The process aspect shows that the implementation followed the guidelines properly, utilizing an inclusive hybrid (online–offline) admission system. In terms of product, all admission quotas were proportionally fulfilled, accompanied by an increase in community satisfaction. Finally, from the outcome aspect, the program positively contributed to expanding educational access for underprivileged groups and enhancing public trust in the school. This study concludes that the CIPPO model is effective for evaluating the success and sustainability of zoning-based educational policies at the school level. The results are expected to serve as an empirical reference for the Jember District Education Office in refining and developing evidence-based policies for future student admission systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S., & Safruddin, C. S. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. https://balaiyanpus.jogjaprov.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=316754

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-13604-000

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315134543/research-act-norman-denzin

Ahmad, I. Z. (2021). Evaluasi Implementasi Kebijakan Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru Tahun 2021 Dengan Sistem Real Time Di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 7(3), 129-135. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/PD/article/view/14211

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Education. https://studylib.net/doc/27157992/1618716074-jody-l.-fitzpatrick-james-r.-sanders-blaine-r.-w-#

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 tentang Sistem Penerimaan Murid Baru. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/315671/permendikdasmen-no-3-tahun-2025

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1977773

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/165024/pp-no-57-tahun-2021

Ulfa, A. S., Romlah, & Fauzan, A. (2024). Evaluasi Kebijakan Sistem Zonasi di SMP Negeri Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, Vol 5(1), pp. 2273-2288. https://www.jurnaledukasia.org/index.php/edukasia/article/view/1253/764

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-13189-000

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED062385

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=590961

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01